IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08

mrex@sap.com (Martin Rex) Fri, 31 March 2017 19:27 UTC

Return-Path: <mrex@sap.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 017031294AA; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 12:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O5u6H-Uf7PoH; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 12:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpde02.smtp.sap-ag.de (smtpde02.smtp.sap-ag.de [155.56.68.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4A5A1294F3; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 12:27:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail07.wdf.sap.corp (mail04.sap.corp [194.39.131.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtpde02.smtp.sap-ag.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3vvs2l6QVDz271q; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 21:27:27 +0200 (CEST)
X-purgate-ID: 152705::1490988447-00002B31-CC3EDB7B/0/0
X-purgate-size: 579
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate-type: clean
X-SAP-SPAM-Status: clean
Received: from ld9781.wdf.sap.corp (ld9781.wdf.sap.corp [10.21.82.193]) by mail07.wdf.sap.corp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3vvs2l18NczGpLg; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 21:27:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by ld9781.wdf.sap.corp (Postfix, from userid 10159) id 214C51A667; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 21:27:27 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERkDzVvhqr9a0zpRLK3mLfKjOCVJ+3TDw0kQAg+Gvr762Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 21:27:27 +0200
CC: "Ackermann, Michael" <MAckermann@bcbsm.com>, "Leddy, John" <John_Leddy@comcast.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis.all@ietf.org>
Reply-To: mrex@sap.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL125 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-Id: <20170331192727.214C51A667@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp>
From: mrex@sap.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/uLrPEOpiZOEFptaAmTuaUzVtvCE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 19:27:36 -0000

Robert Raszuk wrote:
> 
> 
> SRv6 is a first serious consideration why number of enterprise networks
> would benefit from and could consider IPv6 rollout.

Are you "back from the future" and accidentally confusing dreams with
what is currently available?  ;-)


https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/01/19/windows_10_bug_undercuts_ipv6_rollout/

  "The horrible irony of Microsoft waiting on its own team to fix
   a networking bug aside, the post goes some way to highlighting
   why it is that IPv6 is still not widely available: because it's a mess."


-Martin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email