IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Adding IPv10 to the IETF 98 Agenda.

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Tue, 07 March 2017 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3218C1294C8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:10:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.368
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.368 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.229, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jYvjiBkFbefC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:09:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it0-x233.google.com (mail-it0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D81A2129460 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:09:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it0-x233.google.com with SMTP id m27so11779079iti.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 08:09:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=JfKdg9CgvOoAGzYr+KCTRJ59aTLCAPtn+OBfKy5kTyc=; b=uLuzx62mhz+KDyvqTPDrAfMISmTCIQtkRqIW2k6P4ENb3dkdkJMIU9Slnt4Nbzfi4+ +LYoj8FtbSvE1cN3HJw3Q2DJCc2VX8CNyUK0EavfEx5LsvobVPbmi+U2i/twcE8qdOVb rfic9J5mhXXJlfRJ5lGYpxfbgHFl1GRqZfmV1Cf4HxKchyN8y/xnnc1ChmFGp9+4Tv3C sb1sRK24QZdRy7SFhZNBR7G31ryCD2OZKR9kSCD2v6KFgF2GsGlN1FPCxiiclHYI7hV5 NxOJIt2AnENINVgRw8MrMDls2lMtg/ZIGhZMnRdKyfmXVNQG2X0L3yxD/l6LsM1pb3T2 /phw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JfKdg9CgvOoAGzYr+KCTRJ59aTLCAPtn+OBfKy5kTyc=; b=YJ9kp0SueWPNreUPQW4dDpiAWd61E9N9/x6Lzvo0PWR0Sk/kusxc063IuFY3t7D3Ko NRLMV7CMKAbAk00tII+s757FIyGvle/1DY6s9YIUrVwJb1wI5ZqYeILCOvAtIdW2zGd1 FGBxu85/MM50Rc2VNvDqft5d89GjXIDwS03FuoONLNrShrcozSOzrtVf25EG0erwSKfV UCApcWXGyxO8/i6zC/yvQxOr44nma4BeMfDlMMymgtwrVXqDgZFNe+d60yTLWBkjG7M8 yZQqjvXfTFClZ4EpT/0S+qt+a1mEDiCwnPD7xABmfOpe2vUfVM+HmSQiGX2gBMIz39mq KpUQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39l9Nm/Rh3fnVWXqgj0+BjZLgSlNdI+4umWWcjtYhPD1X+z96gPBhTQdvTAS/ORVf+zjJcikrShfzbbreA==
X-Received: by 10.129.119.130 with SMTP id s124mr384123ywc.202.1488902953075; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 08:09:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 10.83.19.20 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:09:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20170307155842.GG13753@mx4.yitter.info>
References: <HE1PR04MB1449B0672C109C5C2A6AC52CBD2C0@HE1PR04MB1449.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <20170307090849.jyl7fqqbn3icjw7a@nic.fr> <CAMm+LwgJg39CFKvxNNPkwC4XUCWPtrSAxTtce34p11UC8E+NyQ@mail.gmail.com> <18ee4435-726b-f054-e90b-419409197c11@gmail.com> <20170307155842.GG13753@mx4.yitter.info>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 11:09:12 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5JvIJ5GelKDummMKuufOjU8MMp4
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwjS5u3XybH3Ps-n4r5rgJr+pT-afqvgkaRDh+tjwQb+Tg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Adding IPv10 to the IETF 98 Agenda.
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114903829f9781054a263be6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ussZOW5R9zU9HamN57ppN2P-oIY>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 16:10:04 -0000

​I have given lightning talks in several W3C plenaries. They are a very
good format for getting many ideas across.

It would be a much better use of plenary time than a lot of things we do.

The ideas do not need to be as wild as 'lets re-engineer protocols in the
narrow waist'. Or they could be the opposite. We might have someone suggest
IPv6 should go on a diet as its waist is not thin enough.




On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 03:42:57PM +0000, Stewart Bryant wrote:
> > It might be interesting to have a wild ideas slot in the form of a
> series of
> > 10 mins
> > talks.
>
> That sounds like a lightning-talks session.  I wonder whether the
> plenary would be a good venue for that, or whether that would be too
> large an audience?  We might not have to do it every time, but perhaps
> this is a suggestion for the IAB technical plenary program to
> consider.  What do people think?
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email