Re: Last Call: <draft-turner-md5-seccon-update-07.txt> (Updated Security Considerations for the MD5 Message-Digest and the HMAC-MD5 Algorithms) to Informational RFC

Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Sat, 11 December 2010 13:19 UTC

Return-Path: <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5643A6ADF; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 05:19:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.578
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.621, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZqWQ0e8Se-bf; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 05:19:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [91.121.26.85]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B215F3A6D21; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 05:18:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBBDK9uK092902; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 13:20:10 GMT (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <201012111320.oBBDK9uK092902@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-turner-md5-seccon-update-07.txt> (Updated Security Considerations for the MD5 Message-Digest and the HMAC-MD5 Algorithms) to Informational RFC
In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 09 Dec 2010 23:00:46 +0100. <201012092200.oB9M0kJL049458@givry.fdupont.fr>
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 14:20:09 +0100
Sender: Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
Cc: "wes@mti-systems.com" <wes@mti-systems.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk" <L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 13:19:17 -0000

I add a third option: enforce the fact the document is about "security
considerations" and add nothing about not security uses, one way or
the other.

Regards

Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr