Re: Functional differentiation and administrative restructuring

avri@psg.com Wed, 08 September 2004 12:56 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA08612; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 08:56:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C523m-0008Oh-Tf; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 09:00:27 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C51xi-0008PK-BP; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 08:54:10 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C51wv-0008D7-Dn for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 08:53:21 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA07791 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 08:53:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: avri@psg.com
Received: from tla.crepundia.net ([194.71.127.149] helo=report.tla-group.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C520Y-0008BF-Lq for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 08:57:08 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (report.tla-group.com [194.71.127.149]) by report.tla-group.com (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id i88CYjeq026760 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 14:35:25 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
In-Reply-To: <B46C0FE1ED11AA817149589D@scan.jck.com>
References: <p06110413bd640a63bcb8@[129.46.75.181]> <B46C0FE1ED11AA817149589D@scan.jck.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <0D614A12-0196-11D9-B7C7-000393CC2112@psg.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 08:53:16 -0400
To: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619)
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Functional differentiation and administrative restructuring
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi John,

Thanks for you analysis.  It was something I felt lacking and has 
helping me in my wavering between the absorption into ISOC model and 
the independent corporate model.

I look forward to your analysis of the absorption model.

a.

On 8 sep 2004, at 01.28, John C Klensin wrote:

> But,
> from a risk analysis standpoint, even the abbreviated list above
> is a pretty long list.  If any one of those assumptions (or any
> of several of those not listed) is not met and things go
> seriously wrong, the odds of the standards process grinding to a
> complete halt -- think "no meetings", "no IESG phone calls",
> and/or "even less functional mailing lists and archives" as
> examples-- are non-trivial.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf