RE: IESG Statement on disruptive posting
"Gray, Eric" <Eric.Gray@marconi.com> Wed, 22 February 2006 17:05 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FBxR7-0001ii-ID; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 12:05:57 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FBxR6-0001ia-CL for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 12:05:56 -0500
Received: from mailgate.pit.comms.marconi.com ([169.144.68.6]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FBxR6-0004Ii-1O for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 12:05:56 -0500
Received: from mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com (mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com [169.144.2.12]) by mailgate.pit.comms.marconi.com (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k1MH5tgL021139; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 12:05:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from uspitsmsgrtr01.pit.comms.marconi.com (uspitsmsgrtr01.pit.comms.marconi.com [169.144.2.221]) by mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA09273; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 12:05:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: by uspitsmsgrtr01.pit.comms.marconi.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <FG7R4F19>; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 12:05:54 -0500
Message-ID: <313680C9A886D511A06000204840E1CF0DAC170E@whq-msgusr-02.pit.comms.marconi.com>
From: "Gray, Eric" <Eric.Gray@marconi.com>
To: 'Brian E Carpenter' <brc@zurich.ibm.com>, "Gray, Eric" <Eric.Gray@marconi.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 12:05:54 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 14582b0692e7f70ce7111d04db3781c8
Cc: 'Sam Hartman' <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: IESG Statement on disruptive posting
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Brian, Thanks for the clarification! -- Eric --> -----Original Message----- --> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brc@zurich.ibm.com] --> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 12:57 PM --> To: Gray, Eric --> Cc: 'Sam Hartman'; ietf@ietf.org --> Subject: Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting --> --> Eric, --> --> Gray, Eric wrote: --> ... --> > ... there is a need to define who --> > is what, he has a valid point. I moderate the MPLS --> mailing list, but --> > there are others who are authorized to do so as well - --> including the --> > ADs and WG Chairs. I assume this is true of other --> mailing lists as --> > well, and I do not think that it is obvious to everyone --> who is on the --> > list of people with authority to manage each list. --> --> That is the reason for the specific reference to the administrators --> listed at https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/nwg_list.cgi. --> > --> > ... the comment that Brian's terminology use --> > is not consistent (Brian says "the moderators or --> maintainers of IETF --> > mailing lists that are not WG mailing lists" in the --> beginning of his --> > message and "where the administrators are listed" later on), --> --> It's not *my* terminology, it's an IESG statement. --> The inconsistent language in the two parts of the statement has --> been noted. --> --> > ... reasonable in saying that a decision --> > should name the AD consulted --> --> Reasonable and should, yes. --> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/nwg_list.cgi lists the --> Areas, which gets you to a choice of two ADs at most, so the --> responsible AD is not hard to find. --> --> > I believe that at least a formal notification must occur and it --> > must list those people involved in making the decision. --> --> Yes, I agree. --> --> > It would also be good from the list administrator's perspective --> > if the notification was at least backed up by the --> consulted AD - if it --> > does not in fact come from the consulted AD(s). --> --> Not sure I see why, but I'd certainly expect the AD to be --> copied. --> --> > ... if there are lists that are --> > maintained by the IETF site that do not properly belong under IESG --> > authority, --> --> Those would not be at --> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/nwg_list.cgi, --> so would be out of scope. --> --> > or if there are lists maintained elsewhere that are kept on --> > behalf of the IETF, but do not fall under IESG authority. --> I don't know --> > that such lists exist, but it is possible that they do. --> --> If they do, they *are* are at --> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/nwg_list.cgi --> --> > Would BoF mailing lists fall into this category? --> --> If they are listed at --> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/nwg_list.cgi. --> --> > ... there should --> > be an announcement that "such-and-such" list now falls under the --> > IESG authority --> --> Ideally yes, but since the list of such lists is public --> at https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/nwg_list.cgi, --> this is low on my list of change requests to the secretariat. --> --> Brian --> --> _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting Sam Hartman
- Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting Sam Hartman
- Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting Sam Hartman
- Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting Brian E Carpenter
- RE: IESG Statement on disruptive posting Gray, Eric
- RE: IESG Statement on disruptive posting JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting Jefsey Morfin
- Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting Sam Hartman
- Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- RE: IESG Statement on disruptive posting Gray, Eric
- Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting Sam Hartman
- Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting JFC (Jefsey) Morfin