Re: RFC5378 alternate procedure (was: Re: IPR Questions Raised by Sam Hartman at the IETF 73 Plenary)

Hi.

I've just reposted this draft as
draft-klensin-rfc5378var-01.txt.  I didn't removing the material
I indicated I was going to remove because this version follows
too quickly on the previous one.

There are only two sets of changes, but the first seemed
sufficiently important to be worth a quick update:

(1) Alfred Hoenes caught several places in which I had
transposed digits or otherwise fouled up RFC numbers to which I
was making reference.  This type of work is sufficiently
confusing without that sort of stupid problem, for which I
apologize -- I thought I had proofread it carefully enough but
obviously did not.  They have been fixed.

(2) I realized that it was necessary for completeness to
un-obsolete 3948 and 4748 if they were going to be referenced,
or material from them picked up and copied into, documents, so I
have inserted a paragraph to take care of that.

Anyone who has successful read the -00 version and understood it
can safely ignore this one.  Anyone who has not yet read -00, or
who tried to read it and was confused by the numbering errors,
may find this version more helpful.

Comments are, of course, welcome on either one.

     john

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf