Re: [Ila] [E] Re: [DMM] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-ila-mobile-00.txt

[Dino Farinacci <[e-mail]>]

I don’t know what you mean. If you put the xTR function on an UPF, then by LISP spec definition, Map-Request, Map-Reply, and Map-Register functionality is part of the UPF.

Dino

> On Feb 5, 2018, at 5:27 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> I suspect there might be a need for a new interface.
> 
> Assuming the LISP mapping system stays in the control plane, next to
> SMF/AMF, and the xTR functions on the UPF, there needs to be probably a
> new interface along the lines of the N4, for managing the LISP MAP
> operations (Reg/Req/Reply/Notify..).  But, off course if the mapping
> system stays in the user-plane, may be there is just interworking with the
> 3GPP authentication interfaces.
> 
> Sri
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 2/5/18, 5:15 PM, "Bogineni, Kalyani"
> <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>> Dino:
>> 
>> Please look at 3GPP TS 23.501 to understand the architecture of NGC. We
>> tried to explain that in the White paper.
>> TS 23.502 has the procedures for the NGC. TS 23.503 specifies the policy
>> and charging control framework for NGC.
>> CT4 has a technical report on protocol aspects for NGC in TR 29.891.
>> 
>> Your draft needs to describe how it fits in the 5G architecture, right
>> now it only addresses 4G.
>> 
>> Kalyani
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ila [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Dino Farinacci
>> Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 7:32 PM
>> To: Bogineni, Kalyani <[e-mail]>
>> Cc: Tom Herbert <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; dmm <[e-mail]>;
>> Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <[e-mail]>
>> Subject: Re: [Ila] [E] Re: [DMM] Fwd: New Version Notification for
>> draft-herbert-ila-mobile-00.txt
>> 
>>> On Feb 6, 2018, at 5:04 AM, Bogineni, Kalyani
>>> <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dino:
>>> 
>>> Can you add a section to show how this proposal would fit in 5G
>>> architecture? 
>> 
>> Can you be more specific in what you¹d like to see in the new section?
>> 
>> There are references throughout the draft where you see eNodeB and pGW
>> that UPF functionality could be at the same network mode location.
>> 
>> Dino
>> _______________________________________________
>> ila mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_
>> listinfo_ila&d=DwIGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=IdiS
>> ODh8aDRjdCeGgd9MznLHMYKgKcs_YSwXBDiaofh47oilzaXYRYETcBynUdpT&m=zf1KfRu4nUF
>> sUT8IJVExPygA_iAC-h4BErkY_CE2ugM&s=oLQOKLOAxuYtjVD_qWMbiQjkmP9acy6Au0X6lpS
>> iBvg&e=
>