Re: [Ila] [E] Re: [DMM] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-ila-mobile-00.txt

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Tue, 06 February 2018 03:23 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ila@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ila@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83503124319; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 19:23:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S8G-l823-etP; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 19:23:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22c.google.com (mail-pf0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD592124D68; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 19:23:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id p1so9768pfh.4; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 19:23:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=UZanuxEzey3P9yJJmlOiDAwPNdx5WXXvaWozTCeIVRs=; b=eQxUPg8Hm4AvqfOt+oY6AebPgAKPWz5T8cWjWgyznqLHWOpPQ/vmTRWUXZIPH9rmqz 6oh9YVxAsSgfyHsD3X3rQu2cSiuF5bu3GbEy7UdojZZcSrRICvRElBfYwEFTZY6LlT/N 4/i119BiBYpgFu4JbS1QIeBQjVxy0H1DwmbfMgASeLuliKtonaspA7AjGfT9feBJuV48 OUZSCfGAdsEczKW/lmpKqfJuHmLfEbRiTeRQG2xiWjt4wgJ7XdipTGbpjgyGK+91QFor klRyqWi3+T1soH8eSrfRjF4My+rxe2aaLh07EZAM1ts1kUIu8Bktau3+Y3pdXovCrKCQ gqBQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=UZanuxEzey3P9yJJmlOiDAwPNdx5WXXvaWozTCeIVRs=; b=QMJ9oiyVTebNZFdpZYuPDud4alqrHqlK7vhC8hrOxm9uZ2cc5RIzsekvp6+JmalDMB GyMTbNsvWx8Zl7BsprBO5IDbMZvwZsowMPn522yi6B3bxuSEP47qsz3L970Zn1VRcn1x LEEjX26Hrb/SqNJBhHpf3gasaX2GyjJgVVRZ8RJZlrQZNisWnAuQLKJu176ry+Vd5X/o ap+Xu3A9+0bjsLp98oYEwgt1gM33GrX7GOZDBLU//ewDumD/2kZsRDtRiLR2dMqkfiiU LEsiTHbKIvoWsxKZHkcJ3PsvYp727Z70VI3ulL4IW5ac5+iOVPUZZsqZnO4b9IX8BC0H UAjQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPDCM76dVov5+73K7C/+Z4BuSLAds2yGNj7El8PcnLsG7CBdnBCe TQLHdDPGyEMwTY7XbUXp8Ks=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225XMlcoGk9vb/NrV9IW4io4VoYPsRTEqF2GJvpZPqFEILDNK+A+HcHd6l+pJ+BIOobpOWlJQw==
X-Received: by 10.99.120.8 with SMTP id t8mr765180pgc.371.1517887432347; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 19:23:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.174.67.169] ([211.185.161.174]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w10sm13910328pgc.69.2018.02.05.19.23.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 05 Feb 2018 19:23:51 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D69E5971.10DDB%sgundave@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 19:11:19 -0800
Cc: Kalyani Bogineni <Kalyani.Bogineni@VerizonWireless.com>, Tom Herbert <tom@quantonium.net>, "ila@ietf.org" <ila@ietf.org>, dmm <dmm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <278FFB84-F3B3-41C8-9CC0-2F19504426A2@gmail.com>
References: <151750859755.24445.6929673804211867286.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAPDqMerbX4UJ-mK-A-f=im=1h0Yz-52QfWLLgVDkybtSShNp5Q@mail.gmail.com> <D698D3B3.2A3906%sgundave@cisco.com> <D43DF85C-75F6-445B-895F-D27CE3285061@gmail.com> <D698E00C.10A01%sgundave@cisco.com> <b9d5a581af5c46d3834f080c8e62b6a3@scwexch12apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com> <1ED57BC0-DBE3-49A9-801C-7F19EE98ECE9@gmail.com> <5d6067277f484e78b561cf511f9d2861@scwexch12apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com> <D69E42B4.10DB3%sgundave@cisco.com> <60D36175-0CB4-48E1-98C1-B7B1CAA0B876@gmail.com> <D69E5671.10DCE%sgundave@cisco.com> <680D7F3C-8417-40A3-856D-205D77B21AA6@gmail.com> <D69E5971.10DDB%sgundave@cisco.com>
To: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ila/wIYfN4_Iak_FlnpEWBBrSpfrTjA>
Subject: Re: [Ila] [E] Re: [DMM] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-ila-mobile-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ila@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Identifier Locator Addressing <ila.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ila>, <mailto:ila-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ila/>
List-Post: <mailto:ila@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ila-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ila>, <mailto:ila-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 03:23:54 -0000

> With any of the IETF protocols, PMIPv6/LISP/ILA, it can be argued that
> these are IP packets. But, we should note that there is interworking
> needed with the 3GPP authentication infrastructure, and the protocol
> specific control plane. Note that these protocols are not doing MN
> identity establishment. May be I could be wrong here on the assumptions
> you have around LISP MN capabilities, but to me MN is a standard 3GPP UE
> with no special capabilities such as MIPv6/LISP MN stack.

The draft draft-ietf-lisp-mn proposes LISP on the UE. That is not what we are proposing for the 3GPP 5G architecture. The draft draft-farinacci-lisp-mobile-network proposes LISP in the eNodeB/UPF and pGW. 

Enclosed is a pointer to the presntation I gave in the LISP WG and 5gangip in Singapore.

Dino

https://www.dropbox.com/s/scmc6eeqyzwme5o/lisp-mobile-network-ietf-sin.pdf