Re: [EAI] Fwd: 82nd IETF - WG/BoF Agendas -- Draft agenda uploaded

["Martin J. Dürst" <[e-mail]>]

Hello Joseph,

In the future, can you please paste the agenda into the mail you send 
out? That way, people can read it on a plane, can comment inline, and 
even just may see it in front of them and find something they want to 
comment on.

I have done that for you below.

Regards,   Martin.

On 2011/11/03 7:08, Joseph Yee wrote:
> All,
>
> Draft agenda uploaded for feedback.  Final agenda deadline is next Monday, 17:00 Pacific Time.
>
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/82/agenda/eai.txt

IETF 82 EAI Agenda

	Email Address Internationalization (EAI)

	Tuesday, November 15, 2011
	13:00 - 15:00 (CST - China Standard Time)
	Room: 101D

	Chairs
		John Klensin
		Joseph Yee

	Agenda
		
		1. Scribe, Blue Sheet, Agenda Bashing

		2. Overall Status Update
			Status Update (RFC4952bis, RFC5336bis, RFC5335bis, RFC5337bis)

		3. Review of core documents, focusing on outstanding issues

			3a. RFC4952bis (only if there's any showstopper issue)

			3b. Review of POP3 UTF8

			3c. Review of IMAP UTF8

			3d. Review of POP & IMAP Downgrade

		4. Plan development discussion for 'Mailinglist UTF8'
			4a. Complete it or not?
			4b. If so, any volunteer to lead the effort?

		5.  Plan development discussion for 'advice' documents
			5a. Approach: Informational? BCP? Applicability Statement?
			5b. To review: consensus from subject matter experts and timeline

		6.  Any other documents?

		7. Any Other Business

		8. Wrap up and Adjourn


> Best,
> Joseph
>
>
> On 2011-11-02, at 8:15 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> --On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 00:33 -0400 Joseph Yee
>> <[e-mail]>  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Draft agenda to post Wednesday.  Given RFC5336bis, RFC5335bis,
>>> RFC5337bis are in IESG evaluation, we should start focus more
>>> to the remaining core docs.  Please let John and I know if you
>>> want some of the session time for presentation.
>>
>> Specifically, while circumstances could force us to make
>> last-minute changes, my assumption is that 5336bis and
>> 5335biswill be done and signed off before IETF 82 starts.
>> 5337bis has already been signed off and forwarded to the RFC
>> Editor; we are not going to talk about it unless someone
>> discovers a showstopper.  I think we should allocate a brief
>> slot for any discussion of 4952bis (framework), since the second
>> Last Call ends on 14 November, but don't expect to spend any
>> time on it unless problems turn up (see below).
>>
>> So I hope the meeting can focus on three main topics:
>>
>> 	-- the three documents that make up the POP/IMAP group
>> 	(i.e., including popimap-downgrade).   The authors and
>> 	co-chairs believe that, modulo an editing pass and some
>> 	issues that are identified in the document, those drafts
>> 	are just about ready to go to the IESG.  My hope is that
>> 	we can tentatively resolve any outstanding issues during
>> 	the meeting, produce (largely editorial) revisions right
>> 	after the meeting, and then go into the Last Call
>> 	process with the goal of having them finished before the
>> 	end of the calendar year.
>>
>> 	-- developing a plan about what to do with the
>> 	"mailinglist" document.  We either need to complete one
>> 	or be prepared to explain to the IESG and the community
>> 	why it is not necessary.  I think we'd welcome a
>> 	volunteer to do a careful review on RFC 5983 and lead a
>> 	discussion about what changes and updates are required
>> 	and how we might get that done.
>> 	
>> 	-- a discussion about what we intend to do with the
>> 	various "advice" documents.  I am personally a little
>> 	more comfortable moving them forward as Proposed
>> 	Standard Applicability Statements than I would have been
>> 	trying to publish ideas for which we have little
>> 	operational experience as BCPs, but that should be part
>> 	of the conversation, along with whether we have enough
>> 	consensus on the subject matter to move forward and
>> 	whether we can make a plan for the documents that won't
>> 	take the WG another several years.
>>
>> Anyone who intends to discuss the Applicability Statement versus
>> BCP topic to carefully read Sections 3.1, 3.2, and 5 of RFC 2026
>> before arriving at our meeting.
>>
>> Reading the latest drafts of draft-ietf-eai-5721bis (POP),
>> draft-ietf-eai-5738bis (IMAP), and
>> draft-ietf-eai-popimap-downgrade is going to be mandatory for
>> having a useful conversation.   Please come prepared.
>>
>> Finally, as another pre-meeting task, I'd encourage everyone to
>> look through 4952bis, possibly in conjunction with the notes on
>> reopening it circulated last week, and submit Last Call comments
>> as you find appropriate.
>>
>> I hope to see many of you in Taipei and to hear, on-list and
>> before the meeting, from anyone who is not coming but who has
>> opinions on any of those topics.
>>
>> best,
>>    john
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IMA mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima
>