Re: [EAI] Comments on draft-ietf-eai-frmwrk-4952bis-01

[Shawn Steele <[e-mail]>]

Like I (sort of didn't) say:  My use of "transcription" muddied the water and lost my point :)

Anyway, I'm (still) happy with -02.

You said:
"In going through what became -02 over the weekend, I discovered several clusters of text that are somewhat redundant with each other or that might be organized to be more easily found or understood.  While I fixed those that I found and for which the fixes seemed straightforward, there are almost certainly others left.  Suggestions about what material can safely be eliminated as covered elsewhere in document, what might better be reorganized and how, and where cross-references are needed would be most welcome."

I think it's mostly fine.  My (longer mail) comments are mostly nitpicking.  I mentioned that I think 9.1 goes into more detail than is strictly necessary, but that need not hold up the doc.  It also skips other interesting cases (full/half width, hiragana/katakana/kanji, etc.)  If I was touching that part, I'd yank most of it and just say "you need to be careful with addresses" and maybe list a few examples of why (like the bullets).

-Shawn