Re: *good* Windows IMAP clients
Eric Berman <ericbe@microsoft.com> Thu, 21 August 1997 15:37 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa10057; 21 Aug 97 11:37 EDT
Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu (root@lists2.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.1]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTPid LAA24071 for <ietf-archive@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>; Thu, 21 Aug 1997 11:41:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with SMTP id IAA03665; Thu, 21 Aug 1997 08:36:29 -0700
Received: from mx2.u.washington.edu (mx2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP id IAA17232 for <imap@lists.u.washington.edu>; Thu, 21 Aug 1997 08:35:46 -0700
Received: from doggate.exchange.microsoft.com (doggate.microsoft.com [131.107.2.63]) by mx2.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.04) with SMTP id IAA12194 for <imap@u.washington.edu>; Thu, 21 Aug 1997 08:35:44 -0700
Received: from POPDOG by doggate.exchange.microsoft.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.1663.0) id RKMG57PS; Thu, 21 Aug 1997 08:36:59 -0700
Received: from ERICBE4.dns.microsoft.com by popdog.exchange.microsoft.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.1663.0) id RKNPJ96V; Thu, 21 Aug 1997 08:36:57 -0700
Message-Id: <01bcae47$dce5f3e0$6f51369d@ericbe4>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 08:35:33 -0700
Sender: IMAP-owner@u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Eric Berman <ericbe@microsoft.com>
To: "Jack Forester, Jr." <jforest2@wvu.edu>, Ernie Oporto <ernie_oporto@mentorg.com>
Cc: imap@u.washington.edu, Steven Bailey <sbailey@exchange.microsoft.com>
MMDF-Warning: Parse error in original version of preceding line at ietf.org
Subject: Re: *good* Windows IMAP clients
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1116.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1116.0
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
The message-as-attachments issue was a bug in the last beta that arose in certain circumstances. It's been fixed. --Eric -----Original Message----- From: Jack Forester, Jr. <jforest2@wvu.edu> To: Ernie Oporto <ernie_oporto@MENTORG.COM>; Chris Box <cb@k-par.co.uk> Cc: imap@u.washington.edu <imap@u.washington.edu> Date: Thursday, August 21, 1997 8:32 AM Subject: Re: *good* Windows IMAP clients > Of all the IMAP clients I've tried, there are none that I really like (they >all seem to be missing some feature here or there that I consider >essential), but the one I hate the least is Outlook Express. However, there >are still some things about it that are really starting to get on my nerves. >The most irritating thing is that it treats the body of certain messages as >attachments of all things, and they have to be opened in notepad. The only >common thing between these messages is that they don't have a >'Mime-version:' header. Microsoft, If you're listening, PLEASE FIX THIS! >IT'S BROKEN! > >Others I've tried include Simeon Mail, Z-Mail Pro, Solstice Internet Mail >Client, and Netscape. According to the folks at Qualcomm, the beta version >of Eudora with IMAP support is due next month, and I'm going to try to get >on the beta program as we have a site license here. I'm really hoping that >IMAP Eudora is as good as the current Eudora. > >Jack Forester, Jr. >Sr. Applications Systems Analyst Programmer >Telecommunications & Network Services >West Virginia University >(304) 293-8703 > >-----Original Message----- >From: Ernie Oporto <ernie_oporto@MENTORG.COM> >To: Chris Box <cb@k-par.co.uk> >Cc: imap@u.washington.edu <imap@u.washington.edu> >Date: Thursday, August 21, 1997 11:11 AM >Subject: Re: *good* Windows IMAP clients > > > >>I love Outlook Express. I've had much less problems that with Netscape >>Communicator and the mail filtering is much better. However, since it's a >>beta, I can't recommend it to be used as a production client. I currently >>use Eudora, which is POP3 based and promises to move to IMAP in December. >> >>Once Outlook Express comes out in final form, I'll be using that from home >>and Eudora 4 at work. >> >>-Ernie >> >>At 11:27 AM 8/21/97 +0100, you wrote: >>>Can anyone recommend to me a good IMAP client to use on Windows (win32) >>>within a LAN environment? >>> >>>I've got fed up of Netscape Communicator's poor interaction with imapd >>>(namely that it takes several seconds to perform any action, and quite >>>often re-opens the connection to the IMAPD server, even resulting in >>>deadlock because two IMAPDs want the lock on the mailfile). >>> >>>If I can't find one I may have to switch to POP3 (which I don't want to >>>do because I'd rather have my mail stored on the server). >>> >>>-- >>>Chris Box mailto:cb@k-par.co.uk >>>K-par Systems Ltd http://www.k-par.co.uk >>> >>> >>-Ernie >>-- >>http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9276 >> _____/ ____ / /Ernie "Shokk" Oporto-SysAdmin >>_____ ____ / \ __ / __ Mentor Graphics Corporation >>\______/ __ __ \______/ __ \___ __ \___ >> >
- *good* Windows IMAP clients Chris Box
- Re: *good* Windows IMAP clients Ernie Oporto
- Re: *good* Windows IMAP clients Jack Forester, Jr.
- Re: *good* Windows IMAP clients Eric Berman
- RE: *good* Windows IMAP clients Marc Michels
- Re: *good* Windows IMAP clients Emmanuel F. Koku
- Re: *good* Windows IMAP clients John T. Wei
- Re: *good* Windows IMAP clients Eric Berman