IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Further IESG feedback on draft-crispin-imapv-17.txt

ned.freed@mrochek.com Fri, 20 September 2002 19:13 UTC

Received: by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) id g8KJD1O02663 for ietf-imapext-bks; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 12:13:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [209.55.107.55]) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g8KJCxk02655 for <ietf-imapext@imc.org>; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 12:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01KMP5PUHPY800628S@mauve.mrochek.com> for ietf-imapext@imc.org; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 12:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 12:12:33 -0700
From: ned.freed@mrochek.com
Subject: Re: Further IESG feedback on draft-crispin-imapv-17.txt
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Fri, 20 Sep 2002 11:34:25 -0700 (PDT)" <MailManager.1032546865.220.mrc@Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM>
To: Mark Crispin <MRC@cac.washington.edu>
Cc: "Jeffrey I. Schiller" <jis@mit.edu>, Larry Osterman <larryo@exchange.MICROSOFT.com>, ned.freed@mrochek.com, IMAP Mailing Liste <imap@u.washington.edu>, IMAP Extensions WG <ietf-imapext@imc.org>, paf@cisco.com
Message-id: <01KMQ1USSBXA00628S@mauve.mrochek.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET="us-ascii"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
References: <3D8B5AA8.5010409@mit.edu> <MailManager.1032546865.220.mrc@Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM>
Sender: owner-ietf-imapext@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-imapext/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-imapext.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-imapext-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

> On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 13:28:08 -0400, Jeffrey I. Schiller wrote:
> > I can live with Mark's proposed paragraph.

> I think that's the only way out of this problem.

> As far as I can tell, the most that a server can do to address Cyrus' concern
> is to add LOGINDISABLED (described in RFC 2595), and remove plaintext SASL
> mechanisms (specifically PLAIN and LOGIN), from the CAPABILITY list.  Beyond
> that, we can not do anything more.

> If this is to be done, then it's more than just changing that paragraph in the
> AUTHENTICATE command.

> Let me issue a new draft with all this in mind.

Sounds like the right way to move forward to me.

				Ned

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email