IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Insipid] Pre-WGLC INSIPID Session-ID Review Comments

"Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com> Fri, 12 September 2014 20:13 UTC

Return-Path: <paulej@packetizer.com>
X-Original-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2741A004C for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.745
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.745 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vnN4wSoPCpWP for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dublin.packetizer.com (dublin.packetizer.com [75.101.130.125]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64A5C1A002F for <insipid@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.20] (cpe-024-211-197-136.nc.res.rr.com [24.211.197.136]) (authenticated bits=0) by dublin.packetizer.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8CKDKBs026967 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 12 Sep 2014 16:13:20 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=packetizer.com; s=dublin; t=1410552801; bh=Qdw6hrPLd0m/M98Nw4XM+e589I7O90l6T/c5czjcxcI=; h=From:To:Subject:Cc:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:Reply-To: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=MwNVPgXaLJ5sjO8s5KOkGStCSgiXp35GcY8TgiGC/rBUIyrCjMiilBOC8s+WYHXVE rDuJ05npH+O/NYIp9x7WWaF6XgbrBRTDwZYBFVF2WmR+clI3Fg0ZZwEv8Tdn0BRB8m +rNZ4WFTXleyDHXSIDafhhJriiFF0JY4XHTBYxzc=
From: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, "Adam Gensler (agensler)" <agensler@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 20:13:30 +0000
Message-Id: <em923187ed-f34a-4d9f-9fe3-105a77dc33b5@sydney>
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D43C3E3@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
User-Agent: eM_Client/6.0.20617.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/insipid/0sFcR_Gwn1PH9dfXpaFN9cnTGUY
Cc: "insipid@ietf.org" <insipid@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Insipid] Pre-WGLC INSIPID Session-ID Review Comments
X-BeenThere: insipid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <insipid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/insipid/>
List-Post: <mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 20:13:44 -0000

Christer,


>You need to give people technical reasons why they reasons they modify 
>Call-ID don't apply to Session-ID. "Because the draft says so" is not 
>such reason :)

How about we modify the first paragraph of Section 7 to read this way:

"In order to ensure the integrity of the end-to-end session identifier, 
intermediaries, such as proxies or session border controllers, MUST NOT 
alter the UUID values found in the Session-ID header, except as 
described in this section."

Would that help or do you think we need something else?

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email