Re: [Insipid] Pre-WGLC INSIPID Session-ID Review Comments

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Fri, 12 September 2014 20:26 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C011A009C for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14UG2ors7NlD for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A8251A0068 for <insipid@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:26:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-f791c6d00000617b-26-541356fb14d6
Received: from ESESSHC023.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 25.E7.24955.BF653145; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 22:26:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.136]) by ESESSHC023.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 22:26:34 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>, "Adam Gensler (agensler)" <agensler@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [Insipid] Pre-WGLC INSIPID Session-ID Review Comments
Thread-Index: AQHPrCDhKQ90DAn8HkiQQ2+H7MoUs5vCdgmAgAMCVACAK5ScIIAAwu+AgAC44oCAC4l3AIAAJIwQ
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 20:26:34 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D4498B3@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D43C3E3@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <em923187ed-f34a-4d9f-9fe3-105a77dc33b5@sydney>
In-Reply-To: <em923187ed-f34a-4d9f-9fe3-105a77dc33b5@sydney>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.149]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrKLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje7vMOEQg61TrS2Wfr/DZjH//jMm i/MXNjA5MHtM+b2R1WPJkp9MHg37jrIHMEdx2aSk5mSWpRbp2yVwZTxa3cNU8IyjovftZrYG xhMcXYycHBICJhJ/V1xhh7DFJC7cW8/WxcjFISRwlFFi3brz7BDOEkaJthP/gTIcHGwCFhLd /7RBGkQEYiWm337CCmIzC2hKrFh8G2yQsICTxNyvs1kgapwlFvyZBmVHSez/dgushkVAVeLt iZlsIDavgK9E8/vlTCC2kEC9xI5lR8BmcgrYSFxefwushhHouO+n1jBB7BKXuPVkPhPE0QIS S/acZ4awRSVePv7HCmErSaw9vJ0F5GSQ29bv0odoVZSY0v2QHWKtoMTJmU9YJjCKzUIydRZC xywkHbOQdCxgZFnFKFqcWpyUm25krJdalJlcXJyfp5eXWrKJERhPB7f8Vt3BePmN4yFGAQ5G JR7eBSbCIUKsiWXFlbmHGKU5WJTEeReemxcsJJCeWJKanZpakFoUX1Sak1p8iJGJg1OqgdFH SEfk7Yx0Geu21hb/uB/zJVLPGNauqJwbvyhq989Lrww8D72OcVA9d8BOcmlkm3vZgqf3YlsE 1LIbJs+Tbjfffr1uWXHcHrXYJj9XwwPJ5wzsdBRrwrxzb8esn7KNo8Hs8JFljYuMfHeLe7SL cWy5vMtXliFIeO7SdscDE7ol+w8vTYlcocRSnJFoqMVcVJwIAFs8vmyIAgAA
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/insipid/45S6XKiPL2GzPQcN7HJC9d9b9E8
Cc: "insipid@ietf.org" <insipid@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Insipid] Pre-WGLC INSIPID Session-ID Review Comments
X-BeenThere: insipid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <insipid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/insipid/>
List-Post: <mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 20:26:39 -0000

Hi Paul,

>>You need to give people technical reasons why they reasons they modify 
>>Call-ID don't apply to Session-ID. "Because the draft says so" is not 
>>such reason :)
>
>How about we modify the first paragraph of Section 7 to read this way:
>
>"In order to ensure the integrity of the end-to-end session identifier, intermediaries, such as proxies >or session border controllers, MUST NOT alter the UUID values found in the Session-ID header, >except as described in this section."
>
>Would that help or do you think we need something else?

Unfortunately I don't think it will help.

No matter what the spec says, intermediaries will modify the header field if they see a need to do so. You need to describe why such need does not occur for the Session-ID header field.

Regards,

Christer