[Insipid] publishing draft-kaplan session-id as historic
Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com> Wed, 13 March 2013 20:36 UTC
Return-Path: <btv1==784b8d51794==HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
X-Original-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE08721F8D5B for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.077, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jtw9jnkw4dnR for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.acmepacket.com (mx2.acmepacket.com [216.41.24.99]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE47C21F8ABC for <insipid@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1363206985-03fc217260f3fcc0001-Waf2p9
Received: from Mail1.acmepacket.com (mail1.acmepacket.com [10.0.0.21]) by mx2.acmepacket.com with ESMTP id oE2ss3PMAzR3Jj9M (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <insipid@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:36:25 -0400 (EDT)
X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: HKaplan@acmepacket.com
Received: from MAIL2.acmepacket.com ([169.254.2.222]) by Mail1.acmepacket.com ([169.254.1.130]) with mapi id 14.02.0283.003; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:36:25 -0400
From: Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
To: "insipid@ietf.org" <insipid@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: publishing draft-kaplan session-id as historic
X-ASG-Orig-Subj: publishing draft-kaplan session-id as historic
Thread-Index: AQHOICpux5bkfvRMbE+xoibi4zwbMA==
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:36:24 +0000
Message-ID: <A4783B9E-AEED-454A-8530-6E5C3BEAC047@acmepacket.com>
References: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05853408683664@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <EEDB748C-2DAC-4B8A-BB94-6D6DE37CEB1C@acmepacket.com>
In-Reply-To: <EEDB748C-2DAC-4B8A-BB94-6D6DE37CEB1C@acmepacket.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [216.41.24.34]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <62BCB99AF7469F4D8D405CBDFF10EDBF@acmepacket.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Barracuda-Connect: mail1.acmepacket.com[10.0.0.21]
X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1363206985
X-Barracuda-Encrypted: AES128-SHA
X-Barracuda-URL: http://216.41.24.99:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi
X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at acmepacket.com
X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00
X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests=
X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.125115 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
Subject: [Insipid] publishing draft-kaplan session-id as historic
X-BeenThere: insipid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <insipid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/insipid>
List-Post: <mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:36:57 -0000
>From today's meeting action I took... below was the email. The difference between draft-kaplan-dispatch-session-id-03 and 02 can be seen here: http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-kaplan-dispatch-session-id-03.txt It did not change the ABNF nor protocol rules. Therefore I propose to submit 03 as independent submission to the RFC Editor, for 'Historic' status. Or 'Epic' status if they have that. :) -hadriel On Aug 17, 2012, at 1:47 PM, Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com> wrote: > > When we talked about this in Vancouver I was thinking there wouldn't be any problem going to/from UUID syntax, because going to/from UUIDs in H.323 was talked about a long, long time ago for session-id. But I forgot about the bug in the draft-kaplan ABNF... > > Since version 01 of draft-kaplan-sip-session-id in 2008, which later became draft-kaplan-dispatch-session-id, the rules for generating the session-id always made it lower-case *hex* characters. I.e., the g-z range wasn't actually possible. The ABNF for it didn't get fixed until draft-kaplan-dispatch-session-id-01 in April 2010, but that also dropped it to 16 characters of hex because the algorithm changed, and then 3 months later reverted back to 32 characters and the correct ABNF. > > So that begs the question of *which* version of draft-kaplan we want to be backwards compatible with. Since draft-kaplan-dispatch-session-id-01 only existed for 3 months, I think we can ignore that one. And since everything else only used hex characters, except the initial 00-draft which itself only existed for 4 months, I think we can ignore that one too. > > Therefore, as far as I can tell we shouldn't have a problem converting draft-kaplan session-ids to/from UUIDs for H.323/whatever. > > -hadriel > > > On Aug 14, 2012, at 4:27 PM, Christer Holmberg wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> In Vancouver, I expressed a wish to make the INSIPID mechanism backward compatible with the draft-kaplan-session-id one, the reason being that it has been around for a relatively long time, and has been implemented and deployed. >> >> I compared the suggested draft-jones solution with the draft-kaplan solution, and I think there are ways to achieve backward compability. >> >> >> -------------- >> >> >> FIRST, looking purely at the ABNF syntax: >> >> The jones ABNF is: >> >> >> Session-ID-UUID = "Session-ID-UUID" HCOLON UUID >> >> >> >> The kaplan ABNF is: >> >> >> >> Session-ID = "Session-ID" HCOLON sess-id >> >> *( SEMI generic-param ) >> >> sess-id = 32(DIGIT / %x61-7A) ; 32 chars of [0-9a-z] >> >> >> >> >> >> Now, assuming 32 chars is enough to carry ONE UUID, jones applications could put the SECOND UUID in a header field parameter (generic-param), rather than combining it with the received UUID. >> >> >> >> Of course, the first UUDI (carried in sess-id) can only contains characters 0-9 and a-z. >> >> >> >> A UUID can contain characters 0-9 and a-f and A-F. >> >> >> >> So, a jones entity would have to be prepared to receive g-z. >> >> >> >> And, as kaplan entity is not prepared to receive capital A-F, a jones entity would have to only use small letters. But, that should not be a problem, afaik, as they have the same meaning as far as UUID is concerned. >> >> >> >> -------------- >> >> >> >> SECOND, looking at it would work functionwise: >> >> >> >> There are two main alternatives: >> >> >> >> >> >> 1. Second UUID is added even when one entity is kaplan compliant >> >> 2. Second UUID is not added when one entity is kaplan compliant >> >> >> >> >> >> Alternative 1: >> >> >> >> When a kaplan entity inserts the first UUID (I use that as a general term, eventhough a kaplan entity does not use UUIDs), one must assume that it is prepared to receive a response from a jones entity which has added the second UUID into the header field parameter. >> >> >> >> When a jones entity inserts the first UUID, one must assume that it is prepared to receive a response from a kaplan entity where the second UUID has *not* been added. >> >> >> >> >> >> Alternative 2: >> >> >> >> When a kaplan entity inserts the first UUID, the jones entity detects (using some identify-a-kaplan-entity mechanism) that it comes from a kaplan entity, so it does not insert a seoncd UUID in the first place. >> >> >> >> As in alternative 1, when a jones entity inserts the first UUID, it has to be prepared to receive a response where the second UUID has not been added (the identify-a-kaplan-entity mechanism might also inform the jones entity that the response comes from a kaplan entity. >> >> >> >> >> >> -------------- >> >> >> >> Now, there will of course be cases, where two UUIDs are required, that won't work. But, kaplan entities would be able to use the session-id for whatever they've used it so far. >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> Christer >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> insipid mailing list >> insipid@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid > > _______________________________________________ > insipid mailing list > insipid@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid
- [Insipid] Backward compability between draft-jone… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Insipid] Backward compability between draft-… R.Jesske
- Re: [Insipid] Backward compability between draft-… R.Jesske
- Re: [Insipid] Backward compability between draft-… Shida Schubert
- Re: [Insipid] Backward compability between draft-… Andrew Allen
- Re: [Insipid] Backward compability between draft-… Leis, Peter (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [Insipid] Backward compability between draft-… VAN GEEL Jan (CIS/SCC)
- Re: [Insipid] Backward compability between draft-… DOLLY, MARTIN C
- Re: [Insipid] Backward compability between draft-… Dawes, Peter, Vodafone Group
- Re: [Insipid] Backward compability between draft-… Hadriel Kaplan
- [Insipid] session-id ABNF (Was: Backward compabil… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Insipid] Backward compability between draft-… Paul E. Jones
- Re: [Insipid] Backward compability between draft-… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Insipid] Backward compability between draft-… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Insipid] Backward compability between draft-… Paul E. Jones
- Re: [Insipid] Backward compability between draft-… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Insipid] Backward compability between draft-… Paul E. Jones
- Re: [Insipid] Backward compability between draft-… Atle Monrad
- Re: [Insipid] Backward compability between draft-… James Polk
- Re: [Insipid] Backward compability between draft-… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Insipid] Backward compability between draft-… Atle Monrad
- Re: [Insipid] Backward compability between draft-… Paul E. Jones
- Re: [Insipid] Backward compability between draft-… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Insipid] Backward compability between draft-… Paul E. Jones
- Re: [Insipid] Backward compability between draft-… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Insipid] Backward compability between draft-… Paul E. Jones
- [Insipid] publishing draft-kaplan session-id as h… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Insipid] publishing draft-kaplan session-id … Robert Sparks
- Re: [Insipid] publishing draft-kaplan session-id … Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Insipid] publishing draft-kaplan session-id … Atle Monrad
- Re: [Insipid] publishing draft-kaplan session-id … DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Insipid] publishing draft-kaplan session-id … James Polk
- Re: [Insipid] publishing draft-kaplan session-id … DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Insipid] publishing draft-kaplan session-id … Mary Barnes
- Re: [Insipid] publishing draft-kaplan session-id … Hadriel Kaplan