[Insipid] Ben Campbell's Discuss on draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-26: (with DISCUSS)

["Ben Campbell" <[e-mail]>]

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-26: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-insipid-session-id/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

(I'm entering a DISCUSS to make sure we get discussion of this topic
among the ISEG before we progress the document. Whatever the outcome, I
expect to clear the DISCUSS and go back to a YES position after the
telechat.)

Please see the thread resulting from Elwyn's gen-art review from the 2nd
IETF last call, called specifically because of the downref to RFC 7206
that was added after the first LC. This downref was due to the
definitions of "communication session" and "session ID" from that RFC.

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/3cLlqju62bY1w5MTA72YpOjL_GQ