Re: [Int-area] FW: Google Statistics for IPv6 adoption.

Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> Sat, 15 April 2017 19:43 UTC

Return-Path: <tom@herbertland.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72CC6129478 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 12:43:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=herbertland-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pav532EyUvGv for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 12:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22a.google.com (mail-qk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80443129471 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 12:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id d131so84725415qkc.3 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 12:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=herbertland-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4v3s8OarNxknO31i9ix2Tg9DN2RAPYS9UCJj6WcM8+0=; b=B5aR1na/jazUG5B/yfG/fixjfpxAWnycn38gqir7Zn9jRAxAUG22qlS3vz3AnTqqe6 JUpOmsCurQOcbgHwo+aLXt4L3jany0ymv+J00UQa0BwOrY4TQA0/0+5G9La0qEjoi1Dv 5HBgA7WfyZdy7Syniy2ON8fNLISV0QoPiVH2GKyI6O6cYXpCeyJkdIV9VpawnU1cWbdK 9oZZeYSQik7ymodCgdsRSbOqSHmxDV6tR9dP9od9fOuNgNjG5cODF/UrSEIKugTybbHI eFKoFiaVdIuic67euXHxJA3y0Kx0RSKVVwBf7JFlUMHAhALvGfiJSxa9HZ2srUwnkNj4 Tvdg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4v3s8OarNxknO31i9ix2Tg9DN2RAPYS9UCJj6WcM8+0=; b=HtocF4qQX/BqvSyIzB07dsgU2pAfPhl28rmqFPdWIvzMT3UVEWAjdDBqvQc0kc8Z/8 T5QOTxWaYIbrw2tuNwA85PqK0Um79ife3XKTlWh3Janm5CFjRiN5AQF/9ZwJlSBVNTDw JwSuQCRB1Z/ULbIUJh+caF23bZKk6Zq8ZIoJa4E/QxH64KR61r6Y3ooMoTD7cW18xNdE OQbg1ef/0GEELIdi6zCx/VrGt6jePcjeIYLH9A6KTkbIwrZbjOv/HPOeegN93et8BwvC AQoIzuytejhDo+D6sZWXrizdbIejrJaBMPi7fjkwf9yqd25ylSuffFJ0+ya2diClmC4F V1SA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/5hg/+9UFhPqlJdSBS199C9MvcEHVjDb4nwIGXrGr8lkT+oDSnX PYjdUgu+wYV/xKP5nDFAi1q9iybXRQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.16.32 with SMTP id a32mr2795810qkh.34.1492285399636; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 12:43:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.97.10 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 12:43:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AM4PR0401MB2241952C48140B9CDB9A3D0CBD040@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <s2q6ra4v8mfmdto5vtook3tn.1492261785444@email.android.com> <AM4PR0401MB2241D692036AE4C55AD392A4BD040@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <CALx6S34DZ_hs=8GBDWdCgpCFL7d2hPxE02owkkRKPnXn2Wv4hQ@mail.gmail.com> <AM4PR0401MB2241952C48140B9CDB9A3D0CBD040@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
From: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 12:43:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CALx6S36f0mR3y-34SdrndjbbK6tueAFGRfx5z8LJ7UEqkj4s1Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
Cc: "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/Rp1BY_BRfUqmI2yzJ3rQud4Yiqo>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] FW: Google Statistics for IPv6 adoption.
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 19:43:22 -0000

On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Khaled Omar
<eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> If there growth will be about 5% for each year, then the full migration will be accomplished after 17 years, during this period, internet hosts will face the division problem and will not have full access to all resources, which mean the internet will be worse.
>
> Using IPv10 during this 17 years can be the solution, if the growth of IPv6 will grow rapidly, then IPv10 will disappear automatically after all hosts are using IPv6, and all Internet hosts will be automatically IPv6 hosts instead of IPv10 hosts, no intervention will be required.
>
Again, you seem eager to completely disregard the realities of
deploying a new protocol on the Internet. You said yourself that IPv10
requires changes to all hosts and routers. That is a _huge_ deal and
such an undertaken would take _longer_ to deploy than just get IPv6
universally deployed. All hosts and routers support IPv6 at this
point, continued adoption is a matter of enabling the protocol in
networks.

Khaled, you obviously have a lot energy and passion for the problem,
but there's simply no logic and no data that supports an IPv10
protocol. I'd suggest you look more closely into current IPv6
deployment issues and see if there's problems there you might want to
tackle.

Tom



> Best Regards,
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Herbert [mailto:tom@herbertland.com]
> Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 5:58 PM
> To: Khaled Omar
> Cc: int-area@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] FW: Google Statistics for IPv6 adoption.
>
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 7:57 AM, Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Khaled Omar [mailto:eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 3:09 PM
>> To: int-area
>> Cc: intarea-ads; intarea-chairs; ietf
>> Subject: Google Statistics for IPv6 adoption.
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please check out this link that shows the statistics of the IPv6 adoption over the past 10 years maybe it will make you believe what was said earlier.
>>
> If you carefully at those graphs it's obvious that there has been exponential growth of IPv6 over the past ten years and we're still on the exponential part of the curve. The data does not support the idea that design, implementation, and deployment of another IP version is needed to solve the problem of IPv6 adoption.
>
> Tom
>
>>  https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html
>>
>> Recent IPv6 adoption (April, 2017) is:
>> 14.83% Native - 0.03% 6to4 - 14.87% Total
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Khaled Omar
>> _______________________________________________
>> Int-area mailing list
>> Int-area@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area