Re: [Int-area] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Wed, 07 August 2019 13:31 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2732812004E; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 06:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g0eWzMBaBK5L; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 06:31:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 336EA120026; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 06:31:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version: Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=F8rdi/qwW9KVDuIIfB4xqBG+hPZpiJ+F6vpOcZsytVU=; b=Ga++ThGLQQ3HqOdjFMA54kD1U BYpOeosqBVcA2ciXTD/RjdrBfhny4Mt0SYskFUs6oiUOn+YHhD3HnUc+VHI/Is+KjcMq2tC4i+YJr cEjid+dvxs/jsV0iXoGIGOSWi7u02LgFhaiV0w9BCz0JwyarWyWpluCHov+nMepsL6YsJn3hCg51p TdOiBBWRZJIazy0RFLLJsUHn3E2PywEKi34GkBYXlQVYcQSsE26mPG+iDm1Pbf2H6cHXjH4zJej1b CQcND2yuLshfqcvVXPfKopXgS/q6EOn4qSWmT+6g/S3vLhEsZk6+YAwh4fUK8eZX7NaYOBHrqxVk3 6rSUv2BIg==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:50381 helo=[192.168.1.6]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1hvM1m-004940-P9; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 09:30:59 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (16G77)
In-Reply-To: <8ffc12ea-7b20-06f5-0ff8-3ba74a0c1bbc@gont.com.ar>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 06:30:54 -0700
Cc: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile@ietf.org, int-area <int-area@ietf.org>, intarea-chairs <intarea-chairs@ietf.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F6B05EE0-4C1F-45E1-AF06-A44E379C80BC@strayalpha.com>
References: <156512344887.27340.5761295053779083959.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALx6S35f9eH1SCFqWZoBtnFrqvdoXrhiPoPQTh2_w-LjwBzRSQ@mail.gmail.com> <6B2DA394-E11A-46C1-8A45-76D59BAF0783@cooperw.in> <974b24af-3f9f-95e3-87ec-d7a14eb9661d@gmail.com> <2b0e4ba4-ae38-7592-b5aa-b5d7201e5534@joelhalpern.com> <7056C34F-EF5E-4582-89FA-CA7C97A43028@strayalpha.com> <8ffc12ea-7b20-06f5-0ff8-3ba74a0c1bbc@gont.com.ar>
To: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/WQSolInah4Rqb73JAQsSHogfYaM>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 13:31:01 -0000

Things that don’t work aren’t always either deprecated or security attacks.

And if we treat them as such, the remainder won’t be useful to anyone for anything.

Joe

On Aug 7, 2019, at 6:09 AM, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> wrote:

>> On 7/8/19 04:09, Joe Touch wrote:
>> Yeah, but that’s the rub.
>> 
>> If we accept the status-quo of a failure to deploy devices that allow a valid protocol capability this way, we’ve basically deprecated it.
> 
> IN a way, it's the operational reality that has deprecated Fragmention
> (and essentially IPv6 EHs, as per RFC7872).
> 
> That is: can you reliably use them? --Not at all... expect when you run
> the network yourself.