IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-pignataro-intarea-gre-ipv6-01

Andrew Yourtchenko <ayourtch@cisco.com> Mon, 01 December 2014 11:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ayourtch@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C7C71A1B53 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 03:53:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tyn2Cep_MY-w for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 03:53:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE3AB1A1B54 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 03:53:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=896; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1417434828; x=1418644428; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=1DOk0K25QWQDDX0rUSUe0pDAT+nwjUbHmwCYmXoxmW0=; b=T9nZECwbe4aGBugXfeyanUNY0jEYMK+dripi+XjiLuSUvYpbCAxPaSoi orVSqRGRv29EdkNacHCt4pWLrUQUFqusBATKVO9CBz9wm63k3/q/c5Akc V4VkFrrgq6ttCye3bvK/q7/EM71APRRUWWbUJzQ/RIH+jlSmbgGpLBSFt s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgQIAG5WfFStJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABbgwZRWQOzKgEBAQEBBQF3kjKGTgKBFBYBAQEBAX2EAwEBAwEdGwI/EAtGVwYOiDwJDdJgAQEBAQEBAQMBAQEBAQEBARqGN4liEQFQB4RIBZVSiCM8gn+DIIk4hAKDfIF7OYEBAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,493,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="373395591"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2014 11:53:35 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com [173.37.183.86]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sB1BrXWB028969 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 1 Dec 2014 11:53:33 GMT
Received: from ams-ayourtch-8816.cisco.com (10.55.47.215) by xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com (173.37.183.86) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 05:53:32 -0600
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 12:53:08 +0100
From: Andrew Yourtchenko <ayourtch@cisco.com>
X-X-Sender: ayourtch@ayourtch-mac
To: "Zuniga, Juan Carlos" <JuanCarlos.Zuniga@InterDigital.com>
In-Reply-To: <785DB11636645E438E2E096E1ADA47C408DB0B@NABESITE.InterDigital.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1412011245040.78621@ayourtch-mac>
References: <785DB11636645E438E2E096E1ADA47C408DB0B@NABESITE.InterDigital.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (OSX 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Originating-IP: [10.55.47.215]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/YogUUry4dzlA3o1faahDs2J5c_g
Cc: "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-pignataro-intarea-gre-ipv6-01
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 11:53:48 -0000

When I've read this document my initial reaction was "wait, does it 
mean it is not defined anywhere *yet*?" - because there's a nontrivial 
amount of running code already operating in this fashion.

As such, the formal document would definitely be useful and I'd 
be in favor for adopting this.

--a


On Fri, 21 Nov 2014, Zuniga, Juan Carlos wrote:

> 
> Hi all,
>
> 
> 
> At the Int-Area WG meeting in Honolulu there was strong support to adopt draft-pignataro-intarea-gre-ipv6-01 as WG draft. We are
> now starting a call on the list to confirm its adoption.
>
> 
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pignataro-intarea-gre-ipv6-01
>
> 
> 
> If you are in favor or against adopting this draft, please reply to this email stating your opinion. The call will finish on
> Friday 2014-12-05.
>
> 
> 
> Regards,
>
> 
> 
> Juan Carlos & Suresh
>
> 
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email