IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-pignataro-intarea-gre-ipv6-01

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Tue, 02 December 2014 23:49 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 415C01A6FC0 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 15:49:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QxlZg-jy0xln for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 15:49:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 069261A1BD2 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 15:49:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [128.9.160.81] (nib.isi.edu [128.9.160.81]) (authenticated bits=0) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id sB2Nmomj017778 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 2 Dec 2014 15:48:50 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <547E4FE5.6020105@isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 15:48:53 -0800
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>, "Zuniga, Juan Carlos" <JuanCarlos.Zuniga@InterDigital.com>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
References: <785DB11636645E438E2E096E1ADA47C408DB0B@NABESITE.InterDigital.com> <547E3A81.7060703@isi.edu> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832DA7E43@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <547E4DD7.90009@isi.edu> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832DA7EC5@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832DA7EC5@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/c7iZ7jDV4nqUCWoU2UpCSDRP0-s
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-pignataro-intarea-gre-ipv6-01
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 23:49:26 -0000


On 12/2/2014 3:46 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> Hi Joe,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Joe Touch [mailto:touch@isi.edu]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 3:40 PM
>> To: Templin, Fred L; Zuniga, Juan Carlos; int-area@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-pignataro-intarea-gre-ipv6-01
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/2/2014 3:26 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
>>> Hi Joe,
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Int-area [mailto:int-area-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Joe Touch
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 2:18 PM
>>>> To: Zuniga, Juan Carlos; int-area@ietf.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-pignataro-intarea-gre-ipv6-01
>>>>
>>>> I read this draft.
>>>>
>>>> IMO, it's fine as long as it is updated to indicate that it reflects
>>>> current deployments.
>>>
>>> You said you read it, but you didn't notice the broken parts?
>>
>> I wasn't approving it as-written. Once it's a WG doc and we know the
>> scope of the discussion, we can all engage in a useful discussion on the
>> details of its content.
> 
> I would like to see my questions addressed before the document could be
> adopted:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/int-area/current/msg04101.html
> 
>> E.g., if it's strictly limited to what is deployed, then it certainly
>> should document all the parts - including the broken ones.
> 
> What is written in the document can't work in real deployments; it does
> not support the IPv6 minimum MTU.

Even if it's broken, documenting it as deployed is important.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email