Re: [Int-area] Progress on draft-laganier-ipv6-khi-01.txt

marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es> Sun, 04 June 2006 08:11 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fmnhz-0007Co-Pq; Sun, 04 Jun 2006 04:11:39 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fmnhy-0007CW-4E for int-area@ietf.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2006 04:11:38 -0400
Received: from stsc1260-eth-s1-s1p1-vip.va.neustar.com ([156.154.16.129] helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fmnhy-0001Ub-2g for int-area@ietf.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2006 04:11:38 -0400
Received: from smtp01.uc3m.es ([163.117.136.121]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FmnFg-0006xm-Mk for int-area@ietf.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2006 03:42:26 -0400
Received: from smtp01.uc3m.es (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EDE2D4ABA; Sun, 4 Jun 2006 09:42:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [163.117.203.168] (unknown [163.117.203.168]) by smtp01.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0D0D558C; Sun, 4 Jun 2006 09:42:20 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <D3FBD458-0EA1-4612-B284-767C60FF10D0@nomadiclab.com>
References: <271CF87FD652F34DBF877CB0CB5D16FC010F70F8@WIN-MSG-21.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <D3FBD458-0EA1-4612-B284-767C60FF10D0@nomadiclab.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <aa5361925440c960c200f6711a097700@it.uc3m.es>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Progress on draft-laganier-ipv6-khi-01.txt
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2006 10:42:21 +0300
To: Pekka Nikander <pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.624)
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Cc: Internet Area <int-area@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: int-area@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/int-area>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: int-area-bounces@lists.ietf.org

El 04/06/2006, a las 9:04, Pekka Nikander escribió:
>
> In my personal opinion, having ORCHIDs that are considered secure now 
> and could be estimated to be secure for the next 20 years or so might 
> be about the right size.
>

but in that case, you need to make ORCHIDs to support multiple hash 
functions, since i guess it is not that clear that we will stick to 
sha-1 for the next 20 years right?

Regards, marcelo


_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area