Re: [Int-dir] [Ext] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-error-reporting-07
Carlos Pignataro <cpignata@gmail.com> Thu, 15 February 2024 16:24 UTC
Return-Path: <cpignata@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80DDDC1519A2; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 08:24:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tlVm-COGlHME; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 08:24:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x129.google.com (mail-lf1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::129]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4B13C1519A6; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 08:23:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x129.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-511972043c3so1293348e87.1; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 08:23:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1708014234; x=1708619034; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1rm9JJQO2ZmkP/UoZ+T4+liuh+XBoY0h4t8438rX0W8=; b=NCeimrjxGG1vgydEpCYR73yQB7QCUsrOLFdtyrrz3fXbi4XJW+95HsTmQFEGf2hrpQ b+bCNL2063o0t2H5dSbKpm0VVqFGOM9SZOZibaEax90HWtRbGG0n7UqNbkP296MxkgKr 0G3FzrsFt21JwCwuvRSDUfY4hyCj3S0DplTd8RnHIX3X+QjT1xYNhgb9u9EFpdFJB7/A ElQx6KKR091tQXLuGtM1bRjgkg+L74fXeH+maDE4Qjsj89Gx5PPAaqsB0nYLcV58V3ch C71VXYkjahGDrnflG+03ZmoSvWgMP/OfgRsrxFoqdetTN6dEvo2xa0a3Bcns4+aeNg3C oQow==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708014234; x=1708619034; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=1rm9JJQO2ZmkP/UoZ+T4+liuh+XBoY0h4t8438rX0W8=; b=o35lnctkZm+B0JMmcHKgP7wqSoyy6g5CkXX9M7jL+0Mbj6RvhENJOxSMNxusatZULk ef3Tp8rdKHePni23VMA+gb+FoWqYnsFz6O6ndnMx7I/6RZVGZZI+MP5v9ZGcOxbMtQse 4y7eZRxC2DJc0iOld7WITw79q07mlo6wnnwFfJEFXGgmOguxoLtKH5WowkmHMg9mZ46o taZ58NNnicOy4olTOdMg1S5VRhcjUdgboJNar08/NvFSxInSzFpWVcaB+or0POU/26xk U6W+jVS9KdGn6Z9kdmGA1X57+vEGUQ5ziPZWeoTfdTw/3x2L549ummPtOYRhKmmZXs4W C0MQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVPp3oXWF2HavZSd1qefKjwGXHmYmC/dwf3FACw2jU52K5wzBY1Wo99KzQCPyNP4tNPqADbebpZh3EANhs4LNEGPyhgn0tDTrheIVFGXqzRviGU+QSGU8hxufeXYa/vpK0qp3SqNn0tsLzXx4Wna7GkmdMcVBWZoo2chv0uPwdpBh2gURF7
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx0UArnN/vA2u6iYcaC8Eh5sqjoNzg+C1BtklZcZw4sb/TrtlWI s4dkFjqMQP91UJdqELPi9BtudHFY6duKXGPpkbFe/qeiHARi9tgEWKbFZ1rD1j0j5a4Ap7rCT09 DP2kQiQGIu/FNxn+KLqY1w2kZqBJl9xH4XzKiKA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFFt4fQ3b59KwEKtM0mxAj8dOmtePbyCDext4FL8JaLZctyQsguADGJ/no8yJ3UmYWYgz8MMPI0v148lm91yS4=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4e8a:0:b0:512:8a45:1a00 with SMTP id o10-20020ac24e8a000000b005128a451a00mr1199507lfr.31.1708014233738; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 08:23:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <170213298005.1168.789324667123128986@ietfa.amsl.com> <8917C5F6-9F1D-4B36-85CF-9CB323325E17@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <8917C5F6-9F1D-4B36-85CF-9CB323325E17@icann.org>
From: Carlos Pignataro <cpignata@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 11:23:42 -0500
Message-ID: <CACe62M=OXY+s_xenrBHWi63GZ2whpJxAfpA-hdwUpJPa15VfYA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roy Arends <roy.arends@icann.org>
Cc: "int-dir@ietf.org" <int-dir@ietf.org>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-error-reporting.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-error-reporting.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ac623306116e0d2d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/l08SLeOv14-WQU75hYjQYTxybDU>
Subject: Re: [Int-dir] [Ext] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-error-reporting-07
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 16:24:31 -0000
Thank you, Roy! On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 7:39 PM Roy Arends <roy.arends@icann.org> wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > > On 9 Dec 2023, at 14:43, Carlos Pignataro via Datatracker < > noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > > > > Reviewer: Carlos Pignataro > > Review result: Ready with Nits > > > > draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-error-reporting > > > > Hi! > > > > I was assigned a review of draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures, > for an > > INTDIR Telechat Review. > > > > Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-error-reporting > > Type Telechat Review > > Team Internet Area Directorate (intdir) > > Deadline 2023-12-09 > > Reviewer Carlos Pignataro > > > > In general, I found the document to be useful and clear, effectively > organzied, > > and easy to follow for an implementor. > > > > Please find below only some minor nits for consideration: > > > > 1. Append a comma after "i.e.". > > > > 2. Change "Well known" to "Well-known". > > > > 3. Capitalization of "RRset" vs. "RRSet", although RFC 8499 mentions > both. > > > > 4. Should RFC 2199 be a Normative reference instead of Informative? > > Ah, good catch. Will fix ‘em all > > Thanks! > > Roy > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Carlos. > > > >
- [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dn… Carlos Pignataro via Datatracker
- Re: [Int-dir] [Ext] Intdir telechat review of dra… Roy Arends
- Re: [Int-dir] [Ext] Intdir telechat review of dra… Carlos Pignataro