[Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-06

Tim Chown via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 01 September 2020 11:35 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Tim Chown via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: int-dir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision.all@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <159896012981.17090.347340103586287782@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Tim Chown <tim.chown@jisc.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 04:35:29 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/zI26lWCu8EIFGsEa9-nEdENxMOs>
Subject: [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-06

Reviewer: Tim Chown
Review result: Ready

Hi,

This is a INT-DIR review of draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-06.

I am not very familiar with RFC5549, and not a subject matter expert, so found
myself referring back to that document quite a lot, trying to get a clear view
of the -bis differences.  I found the addition of a new Section 2 in the -05
version with the key changes listed very helpful.

I believe the document to be Ready for publication.

Tim

[Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-be… Tim Chown via Datatracker
Re: [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-iet… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
Re: [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-iet… Tim Chown
Re: [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-iet… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
Re: [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-iet… Tim Chown