Re: [Iot-onboarding] EduRoam for IoT

[sandoche Balakrichenan <[e-mail]>]

Hi Mohit,

Thanks for your inputs. I did come across your draft on EAP-NOOB during 
the literature search on this topic.

Myselves and Guillaume has been busy in collecting inputs regarding 
roaming for IoT from different quarters. We will compile it and come up 
with a basic use-case document to the group.

We were thinking of LoRaWAN, since it seems to be the most resource 
constrained network in the IoT domain. If we are successful in that, 
then it should mostly work with all other IoT networks.

Our objective is to have a generic solution, and not just oriented for 
LoRaWAN.

Sandoche.

On 10/12/2019 14:31, Mohit Sethi M wrote:
> Hi Sandoche,
>
> I was involved in the development of EAP-NOOB during the early days.
> Back then, we had received a request from Rhys Smith and Josh Howlett
> (from JISC who are involved with eduroam in the UK) for adding roaming
> support.
>
> EAP-NOOB does support roaming. Please look at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-aura-eap-noob-07#appendix-D for more
> information. If you have some requirements that are not met, please feel
> free to suggest them to the EMU working group
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/emu/about/).
>
> I don't know the specific limitations of LoRaWAN. Our colleague, Eduardo
> (in CC), from the University of Murcia has worked on a light-weight
> implementation of EAP-NOOB in Contiki. I am sure he can provide you some
> pointers.
>
> --Mohit
>
> On 12/9/19 11:40 PM, sandoche Balakrichenan wrote:
>> On 09/12/2019 18:45, Michael Richardson wrote:
>>> Eliot Lear <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>       > I think what you are aiming for is a LoRa-enabled router that
>>> can do a
>>>       > radius transaction that has the appropriate federated wrapper,
>>> such as
>>>       > PEAP/EAP-TLS.  Will the LoRa device know its home network?
>>>
>>> At bytes/day?
>> ==> Absolutely.
>>
>> Alternatives could be :
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-aura-eap-noob/?include_text=1
>>
>> and evolving standards from the LAKE WG
>> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/lake/about/) using a PKI
>>
>>> I don't think that it is network onboarding, but application
>>> onboarding that
>>> is desired.
>>>
>> ==> Application onboarding is for the LoRaWAN scenario.
>>
>> Don't we have the need for network onboarding for other IoT networks?
>>
>> The objective is to come with a generic solution, if possible.
>>
>> Sandoche.
>>