IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Iotops] Automatically connecting to stub networks...

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 07 December 2020 21:00 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: iotops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iotops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 511463A0A49 for <iotops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:00:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wwN-o8jjFf_F for <iotops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:00:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x733.google.com (mail-qk1-x733.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::733]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0E723A0A42 for <iotops@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:00:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x733.google.com with SMTP id n142so3902439qkn.2 for <iotops@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:00:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=2V/TDGQa88fmomjRs1AZyrqJ76SclEz3uwN+H6aZqwg=; b=FIqeXcktFJ8Q1A2Dluvu4yujB/5LaNluEZXojRf0CwV7+86sOP3PfRKxQWsQ6P4PVa Hd6JY94OkvwFEjmB2bNCUhZwhWgF7sj0K6+JSOoPpJBCmuT+WT8aopH1xIDHeZ3AZlq9 0DavGSZ7gt92SAdz5OciZf4N4fB7cmib+tk8xCsdWuedp+FGuD0z7vx3U+Tt3HpQTvJz /Vjdtt09F523wjSkrSLIuqjSRIgqoKZHREI3poIrAmEuU+bWRp51HNrpAsC72+WWDvbr PDUZggfWU7Af+03ZWGXspZRGcBiUWHIDqPLgtWpPDN7w8xnOC1kJ5MRrXT1WwDfpYeH3 VviA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=2V/TDGQa88fmomjRs1AZyrqJ76SclEz3uwN+H6aZqwg=; b=QPpO1KyAJVXcF0+Ne0VLWt326hLZz7pYrn01o8OYUtKLlpAlA0VrNqMPS5aa6zYDS1 Z9Pnkp0JkD5m+5J+/pbsykwLvF0rNubDMI+Rl5pD8iZmIOf+yziSOn+xsAKYACZ6qFaq Qgxy93mqjRqu80FuPMbBaljDxgMgzfF3Z5q6yNMIcHmwkMcDFlCxXrU/s1pl3QchfC+a q50MBjiybb7oi+a1CzvwA4A+Eg+npt2K3S5xlOAcEXZ2QrHYbgLyDLhuRutK1MHF3HEp XiKPdeixfYqZVJlL4YePTASL1GuFgKM1k258Q1/bvIlAD01vDUyn61+9ZfGHzh+qYhYa tJmA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533s//TLL7jhD8+QIne2P77N6jmHVD6p4LHC8IhmU2C7OJwMVjDD towzs0pd8r9H8/mXE4DD0kHkPQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx8MJ6cRgA2g6QRuoXeRzjs8E8hjR6IbQ5ykLOJ96pZKvma23DnaHEhMGu5Dx27nCYVWhsCYw==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:a06:: with SMTP id 6mr10530125qkk.376.1607374820460; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:00:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.241] (c-24-91-177-160.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.91.177.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 9sm907456qke.123.2020.12.07.13.00.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:00:19 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <29095871-34BA-41F7-B292-3A993482618F@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4E636FE0-02AB-4F72-B716-296F7FF1A4AF"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.40.0.2.32\))
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 16:00:16 -0500
In-Reply-To: <6816090d7f43480490396c569cf6e24b@boeing.com>
Cc: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Ole Trøan <otroan@employees.org>, 6MAN <6man@ietf.org>, "iotops@ietf.org" <iotops@ietf.org>
To: "Templin (US), Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
References: <6816090d7f43480490396c569cf6e24b@boeing.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.40.0.2.32)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iotops/PBAeJ39gep3Re2p3TRuz_tfhXEY>
Subject: Re: [Iotops] Automatically connecting to stub networks...
X-BeenThere: iotops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IOT Operations <iotops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iotops>, <mailto:iotops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iotops/>
List-Post: <mailto:iotops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iotops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iotops>, <mailto:iotops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 21:00:23 -0000

On Dec 7, 2020, at 3:49 PM, Templin (US), Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> wrote:
> Ted, it surprises me that I don’t seem to be reaching you on this, so maybe we are
> talking about different things? My model for a mobile node

Stub routers aren’t mobile nodes in any meaningful sense. The use case where a “mobile” node might act as a stub router is when it currently tethers, and now needs to provide continuity of service for tethered devices when it has WiFi access. The mobile case is out of scope, and indeed we’ve had a discussion here about issues that come up when tethering with IPv6-only on a mobile device. This is not that discussion.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email