Re: [IPFIX] Search comments and feedbacks about the draft of IPFIX IE extension when considering BGP community

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Wed, 20 July 2016 07:12 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6D412DA1C for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.807
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.807 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ecZzKsmK7TyM for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68C4D12D0DE for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8848; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1468998726; x=1470208326; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=p1KtcOIEett+xbRDgdrkgJBH/wvAe2pUSmUaELaNJYY=; b=hN5vq7wJ99InWBw4eymAT8LihKs7mDAuSV7dG+OXRbiGGKV6Vv2hm4ph 78vupAY3TyV/h363MUqfge2t4avTjMgRn4JbJmGYk2n/znPvpkTNC1irQ wV6oAeizdo4jCH4yO1MNnIckZtbLZwv3GzOgdwK8xni3+jOdxKm+g5MbN M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BNDwCfI49X/xbLJq1dDoJjgSQqUrNqg?= =?us-ascii?q?nWECSSFdgKBfwEBAQEBAWYnhF0BBAEtPg4FCQILOwQHGysRBgEMBgIBARCIFAg?= =?us-ascii?q?OvTEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXBQWGJYF4glWEEhACASGFVQEEhgqCF?= =?us-ascii?q?ZEHhhOFboJhiVGFZ5AgVII+ej06MgGHbwEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,393,1464652800"; d="scan'208,217";a="638684910"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Jul 2016 07:12:04 +0000
Received: from [10.61.242.49] ([10.61.242.49]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u6K7C4pc026547; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 07:12:04 GMT
To: Ariel Gu <gurong@chinamobile.com>, ipfix@ietf.org, n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz, quittek@neclab.eu
References: <002501d1e1c2$8fb45440$af1cfcc0$@chinamobile.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <321dd0a3-986a-6df2-ca29-d414929f36bc@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:12:03 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <002501d1e1c2$8fb45440$af1cfcc0$@chinamobile.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------8480352CD207A395A6CB4B71"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipfix/HsdRUxPBoDOnu80gq5MTK_o_rBQ>
Cc: lizhenqiang <lizhenqiang@chinamobile.com>, Brian Trammell <trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] Search comments and feedbacks about the draft of IPFIX IE extension when considering BGP community
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipfix/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 07:12:09 -0000

Dear all,

We know that the IANA considerations 
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7012#section-7> mentions "expert review" 
for the IPFIX registry <https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml>.
This BGP community is actually a special IPFIX Information Element as 
this is the first one based on RFC 6313 
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6313>(basicList, subTemplateList, 
subTemplateMultiList)
So it deserves special attention, review, and potential documentation as 
its own RFC.

Regards, Benoit

> Hi, dear all.
>
> Nice meeting you in the mail-list of IPFIX. This IETF in Berlin right 
> now, we submit a draft and present it about the IPFIX IE extension 
> when considering BGP community. I’m looking for comments and feedbacks 
> about our idea in new IE added in exporting the flow information 
> correlated with BGP community. As dear chair told me that the 
> mail-list is still alive, I follow the suggestion of putting my draft 
> here and searching for advice and suggestions in the right place.
>
> Before that, I made a short summary of my draft which may be helpful 
> in quick looking at the draft. When we consider traffic steering in 
> our backbone network, we feel that the flow information based on BGP 
> community is quite suitable. That’s the reason why we write the draft. 
> And we now recommend two IEs which may be assigned by IANA: 
> bgpSourceCommunityList and bgpDestinationCommunityList.
>
> If you are facing up with this situations as us, then we can discuss 
> about the IEs especially the details.
>
> The information of my draft: 
> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-00.txt
>
> I’m looking forward for your comments.
>
> Best regards and have a nice trip in Berlin.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Rong Gu
> China Mobile Research Institute
> No.32 Xuanwumen West Street, Xicheng District
> Beijing, China, 100053
> Mobile: +86 13811520541
> Phone: +86 10 15801696688 Ext. 36211
> Email: gurong@chinamobile.com <mailto:huanglu@chinamobile.com>
>