Re: [IPFIX] IETF 81: New work for IPFIX ...

[Benoit Claise <[e-mail]>]

Hi Nevil,
>
> Hi all:
>
> It looks as though the flow-selection draft will be ready to submit
> before the Quebec IETF meeting, so it's time to start discussion
> on new charter items.  Looking back at the minutes from IETF 80 in
> Prague, possible items are:
>
> 1. New versions of the base standards, 5101 and 5102, which implement
>    small changes that did not affect interoperation, (for example
>    adding detail where there are gaps in 5101) as a Standards Track
>    successor to 5101.  Once that had been published as an RFC
>    for some time we could work on moving it to Draft; that should be
>    possible in a reasonably short time.
>
> 2. IE Doctors, a draft that "lays out the ground rules for developing
>    new IPFIX Information Elements, and clarifies how the IE Registry
>    process works." The issues here are
>    a. Should we develop an 'IE Guidelines' draft?
>    b. Do we want to have an 'IE Doctors' team (with IESG overview),
>       an expanded group of IE Expert reviewers, or what?
>
> 3. IPFIX Aggregation.  This seems (to me) to be a required function
>    for IPFIX Mediation.
>
> 4. IPFIX Mediation protocol draft.
>
> 5. Exporting MIB variables using IPFIX draft.
>
> For any of these that we adopt as new work items, I'd like to know
>  - who is prepared to work on writing/editing?  (at least 2 people)
I'm ready to do so for all drafts.

Regards, Benoit.
>  - who is prepared to review these drafts as they change from time
>    to time?  (at least three people)
> If you are prepared to do either of these, please email me a list
> of which item numbers in the list above you're willing to write/edit
> and/or to review.
>
> So, do please send your comments on these to the list, so that we
> can have an informed discussion in Quebec City.
>
> Cheers, Nevil (IPFIX co-chair)
>