[IPFIX] unobserved fields

Andrew Feren <andrewf@plixer.com> Fri, 07 December 2012 18:11 UTC

Return-Path: <andrewf@plixer.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B963B21F8997 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 10:11:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.262
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.262 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.337, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sy40Jekhmv97 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 10:11:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.plixer.com (smtp.plixer.com [66.186.184.193]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B29021F8806 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 10:11:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.100.1.132] ([10.100.1.132]) by smtp.plixer.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 7 Dec 2012 13:11:24 -0500
Message-ID: <50C2314C.20300@plixer.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 13:11:24 -0500
From: Andrew Feren <andrewf@plixer.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/20.0a1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF IPFIX Working Group <ipfix@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Dec 2012 18:11:24.0616 (UTC) FILETIME=[44B7AC80:01CDD4A6]
Subject: [IPFIX] unobserved fields
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 18:11:25 -0000

Hi all,

My earlier email about Extended Field Specifiers reminded me of an other 
draft (draft-aitken-ipfix-unobserved-fields) that doesn't seem to have 
gone anywhere, but that I would love to move forward. Having a standard 
way to know if  field is unobserved/NULL for a given flow would be very 
valuable.

Any other interest?

-Andrew