Re: [IPP] IPP Registration Request for Addition: New keywords for the "media" attribute

Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> Thu, 14 October 2021 15:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B64C3A0A4A for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 08:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pwg.org header.b=na10EKmR; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pwg.org header.b=AWvOqziw; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=msweet.org header.b=rcEoajbl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G2Or6Q8LNjqq for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 08:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (mail.pwg.org [50.116.7.199]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B80D3A0922 for <ipp-archive2@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 08:31:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 476E1BAE1; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 15:31:56 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.pwg.org 476E1BAE1
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pwg.org; s=default; t=1634225516; bh=xsfnkseA0y+N+9TxpNvyShGake7UuZriosa4HR8f29o=; h=In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=na10EKmRNeKLHaQzRPfDbtbQ4Sx8objHtJIhnE/pX5o4NXC4yjw9kEvLnBNDXGbYZ o/3l2lSVIFqJBnGO9m4/fTAjqOxbaTkMS2U0reacvpYJpK88kJGUcF52LB3e9WPSyp IvgUbC1ClNkSyx3P9RQz8lhv2FlrAt3f9FClge5c=
Received: from mail.pwg.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 169654CE6; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 15:31:53 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.pwg.org 169654CE6
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pwg.org; s=default; t=1634225513; bh=xsfnkseA0y+N+9TxpNvyShGake7UuZriosa4HR8f29o=; h=In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=AWvOqziwn01hHgGXvzJb7e5RIdaikAd0c9lVXjjZIgK5uTAlt2Z4ryWBtGHM1858C N/LNZNslDMCnVecXwmh0e0NHklCyc1IwrZeWaCWeBKtWmPILcgb8HYqQAVyBkWtJuX 3AvDZ9ujcc9MuEn0Kcv7gNNhDFn5Uhkxwpqgy4xM=
X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org
Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 397F55C41; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 15:31:51 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.pwg.org 397F55C41
Authentication-Results: mail.pwg.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=msweet.org header.i=@msweet.org header.b="rcEoajbl"
Received: from mail.msweet.org (mail.msweet.org [173.255.209.91]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88208383F for <ipp@pwg.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 15:31:50 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.pwg.org 88208383F
Received: from smtpclient.apple (cbl-66-186-76-47.vianet.ca [66.186.76.47]) by mail.msweet.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 020868209E; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 15:31:49 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.msweet.org 020868209E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=msweet.org; s=default; t=1634225510; bh=bqPlXo8hBCbAFpqNuVioL/8m6TImehiQ13ebkhxh27g=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=rcEoajblW2KvieUN3s6wJsxvqzYmiMa0soLQAM63Cuhh7rAms2buhNmtJq7iXzIut 9OTKjJu9Sd/PaCzfnd8m70ixb5p7FPgiYAnUJKCFqI7Cw9tRepgXjCaTaQR9GgcqXU 4XX/v2twr2roSocipKMgsGC87QQWW+kbWa9VfKf0=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
In-Reply-To: <AE33C8E0-5509-4A7A-8118-0C0D8ED19F3B@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 11:31:48 -0400
Message-Id: <5418889B-D463-4010-BC6F-EC1E19CDCC6B@msweet.org>
References: <D3F320E1-C59A-4189-9874-63EE320D5594@msweet.org> <A7FBE198-02B7-4DD8-A12F-EEBEF062BAD3@crissov.de> <C12B0ABC-8F91-4838-85A3-D9C2A7269141@msweet.org> <78EDCDE8-D550-4614-9837-850E2BA9323F@hp.com> <BB6167BE-C545-4244-915F-94721AF84483@msweet.org> <C7D7FAA7-05E6-4036-B987-27440B4667AF@hp.com> <AE33C8E0-5509-4A7A-8118-0C0D8ED19F3B@hp.com>
To: "Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards)" <smith.kennedy@hp.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
Cc: PWG IPP Workgroup <ipp@pwg.org>
Subject: Re: [IPP] IPP Registration Request for Addition: New keywords for the "media" attribute
X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <ipp.pwg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/options/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipp@pwg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=subscribe>
From: Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org>
Reply-To: Michael Sweet <msweet@msweet.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org
Sender: ipp <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>

Smith,

Yes, I had those corrections already queued up, and send them off to Ira yesterday...


> On Oct 14, 2021, at 11:26 AM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) <smith.kennedy@hp.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi again,
> 
> I noticed that we let another set of typos slip through. These all have an underscore between "photo" and the size descriptor ("12r") but it should have been a dash to be consistent with other "oe_photo" sizes registered previously.
> 
> Current names:
> 
> oe_photo_12r_12x15in
> oe_photo_24r_24x31.5in
> oe_photo_30r_30x40in
> 
> Updated names:
> 
> oe_photo-12r_12x15in
> oe_photo-24r_24x31.5in
> oe_photo-30r_30x40in
> 
> Can these be fixed in the next IANA update?
> 
> Smith
> 
> /**
>     Smith Kennedy
>     HP Inc.
> */
> 
>> On May 28, 2021, at 10:57 AM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Signed PGP part
>> Thank you!
>> 
>> 
>>> On May 28, 2021, at 7:33 AM, Michael Sweet <msweet@msweet.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Smith,
>>> 
>>> Sure, I'll make a note for my next IANA registry update and update the PWG registry now...
>>> 
>>> > On May 28, 2021, at 9:24 AM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) <smith.kennedy@hp.com> wrote:
>>> > 
>>> > Hi Mike,
>>> > 
>>> > We already registered the below keywords, but it was pointed out to me that we let a typo slip through.
>>> > 
>>> > Registered but incorrect ==> "na_arch-e1_32x40in"
>>> > Corrected ==> "na_arch-e1_30x42in"
>>> > 
>>> > Can you please update the registry?
>>> > 
>>> > Smith
>>> > 
>>> > /**
>>> > Smith Kennedy
>>> > HP Inc.
>>> > */
>>> > 
>>> >> On Apr 8, 2021, at 2:54 PM, Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> wrote:
>>> >> 
>>> >> All,
>>> >> 
>>> >> So to clean up HP's registration based on all of the feedback so far (comments in parenthesis from the original request):
>>> >> 
>>> >> Attributes (attribute syntax)
>>> >> Keyword Attribute Value Reference
>>> >> -------------------------------------------------------- --------------
>>> >> media (type2 keyword | name(MAX)) [RFC8011]
>>> >> na_arch-e1_32x40in [HP20210302]
>>> >> oe_photo-s8r_8x12in [HP20210302] (added)
>>> >> oe_photo_12r_12x15in [HP20210302] (added, renamed to 12R)
>>> >> oe_photo-14x18_14x18in [HP20210302]
>>> >> oe_photo-16r_16x20in [HP20210302] (renamed to 16R)
>>> >> oe_photo-22x28_22x28in [HP20210302]
>>> >> oe_photo-22r_22x29.5in [HP20210302] (added)
>>> >> oe_photo-24x30_24x30in [HP20210302]
>>> >> oe_photo_24r_24x31.5in [HP20210302] (added)
>>> >> oe_photo_30r_30x40in [HP20210302] (added)
>>> >> om_photo-30x40_300x400mm [HP20210302] (renamed to centimeter dimensions)
>>> >> om_photo-30x45_300x450mm [HP20210302] (renamed to centimeter dimensions)
>>> >> om_photo-35x46_350x460mm [HP20210302] (renamed to centimeter dimensions)
>>> >> om_photo-40x60_400x600mm [HP20210302] (renamed to centimeter dimensions)
>>> >> om_photo-50x75_500x750mm [HP20210302] (added, common poster size?)
>>> >> om_photo-50x76_500x760mm [HP20210302] (renamed to centimeter dimensions)
>>> >> om_photo-60x90_600x900mm [HP20210302] (renamed to centimeter dimensions)
>>> >> 
>>> >> Thoughts?
>>> >> 
>>> >> ________________________
>>> >> Michael Sweet
>>> >> 
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> ipp mailing list
>>> >> ipp@pwg.org
>>> >> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
>>> > 
>>> 
>>> ________________________
>>> Michael Sweet
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

________________________
Michael Sweet



_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp@pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp