IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ippm] Welcome comment on Performance Measurement on LAG

"li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com" <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com> Fri, 07 August 2020 06:43 UTC

Return-Path: <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3066F3A0A56 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 23:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.089
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.089 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hotmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DX_ovDTZznzb for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 23:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from APC01-SG2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092253100.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.253.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C6B13A0A55 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 23:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=bw8hGsM+tv5Qn/oCqJjMOCF6aY/0UTi970EEELBLXL6YjsNOW2RDtUbto19sxzJ27batcAguSLF9vFbqyBM65Rsk9/jCRWJNSJMLLJgxg8AkRzSBGgimDmvqhh9d8uvg0NFjfOVgdrl2EoJnJMyEWFgzpxZUROxokcXeGxTP3vS++DxHOpCJ4GK+ZZs34VFTgbEn98RdawWNsRTDKXWCoMRHsM9nCUXjy3fora2gd0y4DZPeQxPqXDOaonYVh1TT77H1pZ6qtH7gPqfx0gmCWTjqtRDweHvuAx+FWHYa46m/AU2ElncZWXqBBnBwHjphnj78Uy9jMMPsB5bjATzYyw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=lp6QhGTLuD7W+0E45/RHXCTwRxVVJenzGaP+Mg0lJH4=; b=oLDc2owpxbukobGznizmmtNdCq2xaxlNi6S/Fq3jopSPzZAducjrHwiBXNomocfdBzOhO1l8l9jN63QJT+dlG7XHa7Zsw6cnLD7Jb8GJEDip1ibEbilK3ye95QeNKb4iEyqqm8rN+SOxvq4538fz6Txcxq6fyDiWVKPj9G0+CGY9hoMxBJ6Ad2dmIQuVkfEvx8qL0C3WkT/64iyI5yX41Hc8pyxth/TLB4Bwati9X28A9IrNSEFFvbJzwvXzRE81IksKhaxNXk29mOAK2MeljsDN855dQTYEonLXxcAMWnasemPW7KyybPLPLap1zG0X5GZEI48r3SvVE1SQGjTYsQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=lp6QhGTLuD7W+0E45/RHXCTwRxVVJenzGaP+Mg0lJH4=; b=TjyfhJNP2QfbShXq2Eo9kJJv2xxK1s8s32EePXKfYmQHDV/xRglXXmYgPqRlWNwIbp4sgjpgSzmP7CMhuwaonL76UxeZ6pwkuhpYbRZ1EDZz6OMZ8SAYx/I4/JO0rp7QPyEfpIeo/EkruB3D7n/DrEJOP8H5ril4hbOzCJ5IdytQ4Y2B9OczD52/q75uOLpvNokqDV1XQSAfATdMzW0IX8CPcMMNRsqp7svvvl5FBODcZlyXZrhhD66MI8k4Rg044iRuj9e4FLoScIyQPYIwy779lvHNVetXDAOXYwoiM87914Vs35nTigFCD34mL7uWEMDZV1QbdZ1Y+QoqKbJgTA==
Received: from SG2APC01FT114.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7ebd::40) by SG2APC01HT221.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7ebd::398) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3261.16; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 06:43:12 +0000
Received: from HK0PR03MB4066.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7ebd::49) by SG2APC01FT114.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7ebd::193) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3261.16 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 06:43:12 +0000
X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:6FB2CF94DEC61C8DADD7FDC7B2FBA188AEFAD7D691242C903D2E999B12797C48; UpperCasedChecksum:B27678EBAD2BDD5C7053E0F19DE284642BE9BF86B8A77069284351C07361C003; SizeAsReceived:8623; Count:48
Received: from HK0PR03MB4066.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4821:4bbe:ef2a:6dee]) by HK0PR03MB4066.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4821:4bbe:ef2a:6dee%4]) with mapi id 15.20.3261.019; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 06:43:12 +0000
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 14:43:46 +0800
From: "li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com" <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>
To: ippm <ippm@ietf.org>
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.9.156[cn]
Message-ID: <HK0PR03MB40660A99FCC80DE06E1E8E71FC490@HK0PR03MB4066.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart520016304411_=----"
X-ClientProxiedBy: HK2PR04CA0069.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:202:15::13) To HK0PR03MB4066.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:203:9d::21)
X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <2020080714434554907418@hotmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Received: from cmcc-PC (183.243.255.160) by HK2PR04CA0069.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:202:15::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_1, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.20.3261.19 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 06:43:11 +0000
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.9.156[cn]
X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <2020080714434554907418@hotmail.com>
X-TMN: [KF5k0HikCIMAEobt4/Fais618L5NTE85t9pYItcMs6c=]
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-IncomingHeaderCount: 48
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 45f4b905-91f6-4164-927d-08d83a9d278f
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: SG2APC01HT221:
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: JkUo6rOlxUlBR8Df5Hm/DWt7vUHcUwTEBd5EhC9klVipy8c/gtnXmFTxsSnddzscBOCv0eT6IW3G5WLDJvTSWhJqIOnrOZ8xj8dKa62q00mc83GCdFqZ1pFtJ0bCnxSwza2g1NHUSL6CV/E3kGpb1S9Djj/Bu8/67kD+J/veMoL53gbiQwXZESyeTNtOK5f4/Qwm/UJakVz4udP56k3FKaImBtEkQaQAgPZIVvefvl9qDuP0RtyftsADJEx07tvv
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:0; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:HK0PR03MB4066.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:; DIR:OUT; SFP:1901;
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: XNRkDDvbOcoQH8SgNYAjNtclTYkX0yIwpX9KGFeYVM9f9j8CuWZEq+vEB3pS37Syq5ch5NW5b8dre9XMxiwBsiCAZf1sbEfos9sZhs1WV+i2u8nZHJ/jzzhnEbgmAZ3V3EhViDeWEmEWqjC0zpNAwQ==
X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 45f4b905-91f6-4164-927d-08d83a9d278f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Aug 2020 06:43:12.7598 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: SG2APC01FT114.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SG2APC01HT221
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/DnA3YIaIlFnTa0t0tQkRgPmONf0>
Subject: [ippm] Welcome comment on Performance Measurement on LAG
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 06:43:17 -0000

Hello All,

Performance Measurement on LAG, https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-li-ippm-pm-on-lag-01.txt, was not presented in the past virtual meeting due to limited time. This doc defines extensions to OWAMP, TWAMP and STAMP to implement performance measurement on every member link of a Link Aggregation Group (LAG).  With the measured metrics of each member link of a LAG, it enables operators to enforce performance metric based traffic steering policy among the member links.

The requirements come from field networks, where the link delays of the member links of a LAG are different because the member links are over different transport paths.  To provide low delay service to time sensitive traffic, we have to know the link delay of each member link of a LAG and then steer traffic accordingly.

We appreciate all the comments and suggestions.

Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li


li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email