Re: [ippm] Welcome comment on Performance Measurement on LAG

Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com> Tue, 11 August 2020 07:12 UTC

Return-Path: <mach.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7584D3A0D7F for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:12:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KfAEVFjhjmIF for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A5583A0D74 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml708-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 92E0C55695CC4300E6E1; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 08:12:05 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lhreml708-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.57) by lhreml708-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.57) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1913.5; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 08:12:05 +0100
Received: from DGGEML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.38) by lhreml708-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.57) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.1913.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 08:12:05 +0100
Received: from DGGEML530-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.36]) by DGGEML402-HUB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::fca6:7568:4ee3:c776%31]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 15:11:58 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
To: "li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com" <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>, ippm <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] Welcome comment on Performance Measurement on LAG
Thread-Index: AQHWbIYd3jJ4GBdtCkeejzG7SrIvQ6kyg3GA
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 07:11:56 +0000
Message-ID: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE297D98923@dggeml530-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <HK0PR03MB40660A99FCC80DE06E1E8E71FC490@HK0PR03MB4066.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <HK0PR03MB40660A99FCC80DE06E1E8E71FC490@HK0PR03MB4066.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.243.140]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE297D98923dggeml530mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/wKrNjBSe_Si1pwNzW_1EEjkpq-0>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Welcome comment on Performance Measurement on LAG
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 07:12:10 -0000

Hi Zhengqiang,

Seems that the below link is not available, here is an alternative ( https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-ippm-pm-on-lag-01 )

Best regards,
Mach

From: ippm [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2020 2:44 PM
To: ippm <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: [ippm] Welcome comment on Performance Measurement on LAG

Hello All,

Performance Measurement on LAG, https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-li-ippm-pm-on-lag-01.txt<https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-li-ippm-pm-on-lag-00.txt>, was not presented in the past virtual meeting due to limited time. This doc defines extensions to OWAMP, TWAMP and STAMP to implement performance measurement on every member link of a Link Aggregation Group (LAG).  With the measured metrics of each member link of a LAG, it enables operators to enforce performance metric based traffic steering policy among the member links.

The requirements come from field networks, where the link delays of the member links of a LAG are different because the member links are over different transport paths.  To provide low delay service to time sensitive traffic, we have to know the link delay of each member link of a LAG and then steer traffic accordingly.

We appreciate all the comments and suggestions.

Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li
________________________________
li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com<mailto:li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>