Re: [ippm] Welcome comment on Performance Measurement on LAG

[Mach Chen <[e-mail]>]

Hi Xiaomin,

Thanks for the suggestion!

As one of the co-authors, I am open to keep them in one document or separate it into two documents.

Best regards,
Mach

From: ippm [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of [e-mail]
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2020 2:45 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [ippm] Welcome comment on Performance Measurement on LAG


Hi Zhenqiang,



Thanks for the nice draft addressing a real problem in field networks.

I propose to split this draft into two new drafts, one for OWAMP/TWAMP, another for STAMP. I think that will facilitate folks to read and evaluate them.



Best Regards,

Xiao Min
原始邮件
发件人：[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
收件人：ippm <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>;
日 期 ：2020年08月07日 14:43
主 题 ：[ippm] Welcome comment on Performance Measurement on LAG
_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
Hello All,

Performance Measurement on LAG, https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-li-ippm-pm-on-lag-01.txt<https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-li-ippm-pm-on-lag-00.txt>, was not presented in the past virtual meeting due to limited time. This doc defines extensions to OWAMP, TWAMP and STAMP to implement performance measurement on every member link of a Link Aggregation Group (LAG).  With the measured metrics of each member link of a LAG, it enables operators to enforce performance metric based traffic steering policy among the member links.

The requirements come from field networks, where the link delays of the member links of a LAG are different because the member links are over different transport paths.  To provide low delay service to time sensitive traffic, we have to know the link delay of each member link of a LAG and then steer traffic accordingly.

We appreciate all the comments and suggestions.

Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li
________________________________
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>