Re: [ippm] draft-morton-ippm-owamp-registry call for adoption and draft-elkins-ippm-6man-pdm-option accepted for adoption

Nalini Elkins <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com> Fri, 19 June 2015 00:54 UTC

Return-Path: <nalini_elkins@insidethestack.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F76B1B2E32 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 17:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, MANGLED_LIST=2.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ohQ5angNVajk for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 17:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm48-vm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm48-vm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.121.113]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DA7A1B2E30 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 17:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1434675256; bh=AgRJA0Najpop7BsubDbyQ41nMLo9eJGmJHRXYkGql/s=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=LtSAsKAErr9+Vubm85fRo/j6uzlG/r6gBHPeoWjPKTK7D3JY9LCqnAbq74D+r3OM58sozKSrfFlbZOa9WhjPEITpS9CPRNGC7x7F59i/Fc05eF0DoStklNJ1e2Dz4bf9PmpJtFg2cW8lXCbfDGDZNzPPiyXcwUbMmLO3n/bpMVs+185gVLXKA1nyTwqVOfoVU+++O0UIe4fne7Z9Ita8PMn6ALlGnVD9Jfx4ig1Ducq6o9PKTdp5/BwgU+I8UhJ0zcDYn3S0ugxR9nI7nidhs9BrdudLHAjB0yBkihE/a/KwoMW2wGHQfcDkK8HL0gdkZBLTz53KNplCzh9IkCd6zg==
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by nm48.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Jun 2015 00:54:16 -0000
Received: from [98.138.100.102] by nm48.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Jun 2015 00:51:16 -0000
Received: from [98.138.88.232] by tm101.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Jun 2015 00:51:16 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1032.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Jun 2015 00:51:16 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-4
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 943439.52631.bm@omp1032.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
X-YMail-OSG: 7ZdyQxkVM1kKKX1os_fnEMMRB0w6P.WSq29mEc1eJfSe7lqVb9C9y1qw6E6Dw7R nKCUsd2ATPD7nfBNPKjSlFD9HqIVRQzrpgiE7augoBJTaO6HUSNSrptByVLngdx80bSTBwJpBq8i LfnWZBEuS8kSKjL2Q9g0miZqtsYYXKMzPzYEA1MYgwvZTLP5IxXHU9sSOlJer_SSBPV.r4KVGrBi Y2GzWcb9XSiBwMTQ73A2hHN966olcp4vmhTltV8VH36c_m1Hy0EgAtmc2DNTkW3_IQU_dhb237au LX7gS47d.akbgzW0vJukyasiVhbiUg6WJ3LFdHF6o0bKRHVaDnjpNyi0sYXck95rAi.1xqbh7k_c QSaWvxqh4P4TonF.bLXwZem2RZzyqcp2ZLsQijPDbz0lhIKN1uZPs4b1LfwYBAt9LzpBmxIo.ANd Q5twdQZMboEZP9kTNZCH6HLVKF1dZRj0V4PjN0ls1wP8pbTHsSuZB9dlINt7xu8N35xHQjt9JmO7 d7uoj9zXubqBpxMFAOFiNfjuCOY63XQmvlIAwTMDgtEq14iLvGAu0ziWgpjOK717SNp0TX58-
Received: by 98.138.105.194; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:51:16 +0000
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:51:15 +0000
From: Nalini Elkins <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com>
To: Bill Cerveny <ippm@wjcerveny.com>, "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <899632003.1551587.1434675075831.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <A70677AE-2C1F-46F0-86F1-797E5F2D6E34@wjcerveny.com>
References: <A70677AE-2C1F-46F0-86F1-797E5F2D6E34@wjcerveny.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/DjTQoG6bDa1Nqu-5G5FANlVe9y4>
Subject: Re: [ippm] draft-morton-ippm-owamp-registry call for adoption and draft-elkins-ippm-6man-pdm-option accepted for adoption
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Nalini Elkins <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com>
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:54:18 -0000

IPPM,

(a) whether you support the addition of the milestone and the adoption of the draft as a WG item to fulfill that milestone 


Yes, I support it.

(b) whether you have read the draft 

Yes, I have read it.   Some comments:

1.  Section 1, paragraph 1, 1st sentence, reads in part:


"measurements of metrics specified by the IP Performance Metrics (WG in the IETF"

There may be a typo here, I suspect you want:

"measurements of metrics specified by the IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) WG in the IETF"


2.  I wonder if it makes sense to add something like the following sentence to either section 1. Introduction or Section 3.2.4
"OWAMP and TWAMP registries for commands and modes may contain different parameters and functions due to the inherent differences in what they are measuring.  No attempt will be made to coordinate them unnecessarily."


(c) whether you pledge to review the draft during the WG process. 

I so pledge.
 
Thanks,


Nalini Elkins
Inside Products, Inc.
(831) 659-8360
www.insidethestack.com



________________________________
From: Bill Cerveny <ippm@wjcerveny.com>
To: ippm@ietf.org 
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 1:55 PM
Subject: [ippm] draft-morton-ippm-owamp-registry call for adoption and draft-elkins-ippm-6man-pdm-option accepted for adoption



Dear IPPM participants,

As noted in discussions for which the IPPM working group has been cc’ed on, draft draft-morton-ippm-owamp-registry-00, "Registries for the One-Way Active Measurement Protocol - OWAMP" has been proposed to establish an OWAMP registry.  The first mission of an OWAMP registry would be to support a registry entry for draft-ietf-ippm-ipsec, which is currently in IESG evaluation.

Please indicate:
(a) whether you support the addition of the milestone and the adoption 
of the draft as a WG item to fulfill that milestone 
(b) whether you have read the draft 
(c) whether you pledge to review the draft during the WG process. 


This working group last call runs for 2 weeks, but if there is sufficient support the draft may be accepted earlier so that draft-ietf-ippm-ipsec can progress.

Also, draft-elkins-ippm-6man-pdm-option has been accepted for adoption by the IPPM working group.

Regards,

Bill Cerveny
IPPM WG co-chair
_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm