Re: [ippm] draft-morton-ippm-owamp-registry call for adoption and draft-elkins-ippm-6man-pdm-option accepted for adoption

[Kostas Pentikousis <[e-mail]>]

Dear Bill, all,

| As noted in discussions for which the IPPM working group has been cc’ed on,
| draft draft-morton-ippm-owamp-registry-00, "Registries for the One-Way
| Active Measurement Protocol - OWAMP" has been proposed to establish
| an OWAMP registry.

<snip>

| Please indicate:
| (a) whether you support the addition of the milestone and the adoption
| of the draft as a WG item to fulfill that milestone 

I support both the milestone addition and draft adoption as a WG item.

| (b) whether you have read the draft 

I did. Overall reads well, but needs some further editing. But it is a perfect start for the WG document. Some editorial suggestions/nits:

s/Metrics (WG in/Metrics WG in

s/for OMAMP until/for OWAMP until

s/OWAMP Control/OWAMP-Control/g

Should the reference to "section 3" in Sec. 3.1 of this draft ("Control Command Number Registry") be more specific, pointing instead to sec. 3.4 of RFC4656?

In the table of sec. 3.2.4, perhaps it's better to be more specific and s/IPsec mode/IKEv2-derived Shared Secret Key


| (c) whether you pledge to review the draft during the WG process. 

Sure. 

Best regards,

Kostas