Re: [ippm] draft-morton-ippm-owamp-registry call for adoption and draft-elkins-ippm-6man-pdm-option accepted for adoption

Thanks Nalini,  good suggestion too.
Al

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ippm [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Nalini Elkins
> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 8:51 PM
> To: Bill Cerveny; ippm@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [ippm] draft-morton-ippm-owamp-registry call for adoption
> and draft-elkins-ippm-6man-pdm-option accepted for adoption
> 
> IPPM,
> 
> (a) whether you support the addition of the milestone and the adoption
> of the draft as a WG item to fulfill that milestone
> 
> 
> Yes, I support it.
> 
> (b) whether you have read the draft
> 
> Yes, I have read it.   Some comments:
> 
> 1.  Section 1, paragraph 1, 1st sentence, reads in part:
> 
> 
> "measurements of metrics specified by the IP Performance Metrics (WG in
> the IETF"
> 
> There may be a typo here, I suspect you want:
> 
> "measurements of metrics specified by the IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)
> WG in the IETF"
> 
> 
> 2.  I wonder if it makes sense to add something like the following
> sentence to either section 1. Introduction or Section 3.2.4 "OWAMP and
> TWAMP registries for commands and modes may contain different parameters
> and functions due to the inherent differences in what they are
> measuring.  No attempt will be made to coordinate them unnecessarily."
> 
> 
> (c) whether you pledge to review the draft during the WG process.
> 
> I so pledge.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> Nalini Elkins
> Inside Products, Inc.
> (831) 659-8360
> www.insidethestack.com
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Bill Cerveny <ippm@wjcerveny.com>
> To: ippm@ietf.org
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 1:55 PM
> Subject: [ippm] draft-morton-ippm-owamp-registry call for adoption and
> draft-elkins-ippm-6man-pdm-option accepted for adoption
> 
> 
> 
> Dear IPPM participants,
> 
> As noted in discussions for which the IPPM working group has been cc’ed
> on, draft draft-morton-ippm-owamp-registry-00, "Registries for the One-
> Way Active Measurement Protocol - OWAMP" has been proposed to establish
> an OWAMP registry.  The first mission of an OWAMP registry would be to
> support a registry entry for draft-ietf-ippm-ipsec, which is currently
> in IESG evaluation.
> 
> Please indicate:
> (a) whether you support the addition of the milestone and the adoption
> of the draft as a WG item to fulfill that milestone
> (b) whether you have read the draft
> (c) whether you pledge to review the draft during the WG process.
> 
> 
> This working group last call runs for 2 weeks, but if there is
> sufficient support the draft may be accepted earlier so that draft-ietf-
> ippm-ipsec can progress.
> 
> Also, draft-elkins-ippm-6man-pdm-option has been accepted for adoption
> by the IPPM working group.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Bill Cerveny
> IPPM WG co-chair
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm