Re: [ippm] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-05

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Wed, 24 February 2021 16:11 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17DEC3A177D; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 08:11:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=YoVj1AGs; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=cBrmjhTm
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y7duMh_ElecQ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 08:11:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 571033A177F; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 08:11:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10F982B; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 11:11:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 11:11:28 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=x eer7ZuFjd4DMIdc3lpnt0otcmRBKCiJuqqP3JKHUrw=; b=YoVj1AGsiw6lJltxX F+ufMPZ8urFmqNRGX2y+kZPilRfssEATVKKQaxRrU7oI6c3am2Owq4ZzWUmBStQA I1jVaJmaW2+hEa2n2TGr1xFFPOeYMecdVW3yMMl61qs7me3pXxYQCcLc7iKM37MJ BlTKYLGLfd0GEmKJ2epQWHEYUFNwpSizTpDJm6sunMAMJ+pmPBpI28BGuY+vcUNx 9CBKaBqR/NQWNBPI3J3rpQ58cS3qQaH2d+neeU8nKO/AAzDLjZtOy22x+ymgbnEV /JkccAcKy4AaKi39gq763e9pS7b/HO9FnkJzJ25EyR8gf8nNmzDIV5WLUTCQNkH/ hB8aw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=xeer7ZuFjd4DMIdc3lpnt0otcmRBKCiJuqqP3JKHU rw=; b=cBrmjhTmcYFeAlfZGVpdKhk5tOkN0XDIcx0rFiu6sYU3tOBuev8PRjjUg I1qPi4MPmRa7pm+RcpqqM36OuDhBcl/3xjPEaUGS0jbPf9j+2HeOe84MHL+tblUP fOXyLWEvOSBfur+k976NYmv5VgWV8HtMgjL6enJbnT0cTat9iAPe4CgFxiILEg+X gNehuHr3afo57ZN7UA2Q8Zvm9e5u6yEDhS62jlKVzktvXqZmfD/U2sTWn8Sok4F1 8iJFOmlJqaSIdLjdmzF1IMyI3HBXNl4gBJxPzGlWKk/zXCRr8f6RHziV2sUFpwU5 HtzjEedYD051+kRyW9pr1yaqr2FYA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:rno2YJnk7DpM_HvdYy6tl2ovphBOuR23TEnq2ym-NIEVclMxXqGURA> <xme:rno2YE3nQJ-jiEA5Vk9n3Uv6TQ04NAn119B63Yai9rt8xYF1S1oKCtHZyMX54li5z b8kNSarhFi6aBgM1w>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrkeejgdekgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhishhs rgcuvehoohhpvghruceorghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepjeegiefhvddvgedvffekkefhveelleffjeefffekuedvieeftdetuddtkeef tedvnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhdpihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecukfhppe dujeefrdefkedruddujedrkeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghm pehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:rno2YPoBzhanxpxBzpIBIOh5FaXEnOqSP_KQNqIyW_PUdGqfk4vPrQ> <xmx:rno2YJnf2K6PZpJRUMQKQKm0IWS1IMnNHgA3mskUcS5VQOU8O5_MUQ> <xmx:rno2YH1uilYAkEK-VfwSfHTOE7bwjE7XQfhdH25mYEW-L5J_A92C-Q> <xmx:r3o2YIxhl55WtKfsJPG3u9HgGJsYcufAcT-pk_y_RezujN-sRvVbEg>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.84]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3386E108005F; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 11:11:25 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF014769BD6A@njmtexg5.research.att.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 11:11:24 -0500
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method.all@ietf.org>, "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <228C8A3B-17F1-40DD-B4C9-432F95EB68A5@cooperw.in>
References: <161314437215.27849.15366890249325519802@ietfa.amsl.com> <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF014769BD6A@njmtexg5.research.att.com>
To: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com>, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/IamjJeR3L__VzBuNr_icHgEfeRs>
Subject: Re: [ippm] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-05
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 16:11:32 -0000

Stewart, thanks for your review. Al, thanks for responding. I entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa


> On Feb 12, 2021, at 12:04 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acm@research.att.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for your review, Stewart!
> 
> please see reply below,
> Al
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Stewart Bryant via Datatracker [mailto:noreply@ietf.org]
>> Sent: Friday, February 12, 2021 10:40 AM
> ...
>> Summary: A well written text ready for publication
> [acm] 
> Thanks!
>> 
>> Major issues: None
>> 
>> Minor issues: None
>> 
>> Nits/editorial comments:
>> 8.4.  Running Code
>> 
>>   This section is for the benefit of the Document Shepherd's form, and
>>   will be deleted prior to final review.
>> 
>> SB> I am wondering if this was supposed to be deleted before this review,
>> or whether you plan to keep it?
> [acm] 
> Yes, we'll certainly delete this section before the RFC Editors see it. However,
> there is a lot of review yet to happen. I really don't mind if the IESG
> sees it in some form, but we don't want to risk endorsing one implementation, IIRC.
> 
> Also, this material could move to the Doc Shepherd's form, but has not yet:
> 	Document Quality:
> 
> 	Are there existing implementations of the protocol? ...
> 
> I see that we need to update the reference in section 8.4:
> OLD
> [udpst]    AT&T, "UDP Speed Test Open Broadband project", August
>              2020, <https://github.com/BroadbandForum <TBD>>.
> NEW
> [udpst]    udpst Project Collaborators, "UDP Speed Test Open Broadband project", 
>              December 2020, <https://github.com/BroadbandForum/obudpst>.
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art