Re: [ippm] Re-call for adoption: draft-xiao-ippm-ioam-conf-state

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Fri, 02 July 2021 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1BA3A2337 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 09:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M6U6IGbGjYGc for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 08:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102f.google.com (mail-pj1-x102f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB3DB3A2335 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 08:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102f.google.com with SMTP id l11so6586652pji.5 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 08:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NdCXfx2TjYCPuc1sGeZ+7M0HkMnoihn9nn653kE448E=; b=q1OSjB/CnwGj6WEcV368pDPk861Hsb9JtuOcjqaswvqiUXdbqq4EYSN9uzusZtDv/+ hoaP13GPZOF78MaxeV1boHoxDhMimWhgmrLu52qnWzDn/LTzXngcHraGI6viDCKBXsBw QjY1+7psIpciRS9S6ln4jCLWtPJH3mJ+I4jlf+Yz1HVQmiOhH8heANcIAAfUDdzarQCy zklENrgyZPbFJ5d6ZXeqf5Ib2Dc3QWDOrPo53f4pwF+xw0hDKwnsUvzlKtbt6rfbwKXq jyueaElhein9GU8hRzzZcQpfFfSJU9SuvafWDf3VWfB5ufcdCO14jNXJMJ3mrOSj8/x5 mgpA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NdCXfx2TjYCPuc1sGeZ+7M0HkMnoihn9nn653kE448E=; b=Qlb+fTLWcCGIxSvkm6CkMB/QvrHBaXTCHpELcDOjV/A/Vp7/8W8shFzmc1KaXdX5kB bHbNHdYLwiLuf6BUdDKkk92cj+jGKW6syePY1g/OizTpTSfLLuAMcEexWJcNTotad8jj 2IFYNhI2jcVBgcY0vnx/Ma+1nsc/DTIZVFNZ4OTZat7XngoLNFEe2T/uhxKqSWQoAwSz jRrmmqmaDHK81ctkxkHaElG0hrbMy+r9/CdWy1G1vxxJ7cM4ML0kSmkyx5T+oxA0jodB LBsrdwx2PM7eqDOODFn2LAgzg6pTmeqWV4ai2iXLzFjtb0Z4HEWvT/JLwmRyfflFMSFG Iaxg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531wNXm+zlvoaM7RdNG1HJkoCOqMr2qAWt7067/l2L8OBvUCIAKX IKnvKYsQQl47cfmgaHrqM6mZ5elWK7TJvWSCj4c=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxgCoPXRwzN3I15cGDJXihMSVJz2mjvRkngbCIP12lJa+tnno0BE69mUKZVwfzQVK6LX5EyJRp7y4xEsbPqO0s=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:fa92:: with SMTP id cu18mr425015pjb.215.1625241595638; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 08:59:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <956C2EA9-5703-4318-BD97-32EE60A4C011@apple.com> <202107021030004065160@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <202107021030004065160@zte.com.cn>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 11:59:44 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV3UwLc=LoyezLkxrcXZUd2o=xeKaKEScYsOX_R5DKOfzg@mail.gmail.com>
To: gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com
Cc: ippm@ietf.org, tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="000000000000fba4e405c6260b81"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/QO1wutqGR4nYByz2BZVL-WS4yQ8>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Re-call for adoption: draft-xiao-ippm-ioam-conf-state
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2021 16:00:02 -0000

Dear Authors

I support WG adoption.

This is a valuable telemetry tool in the operators toolbox for in-situ IOAM
transit nodes data container  encap / decap within IOAM domain, with this
extension to existing OAM echo-request/reply used in IPv6, MPLS, SFC, BIER,
SR.

Highly valuable to operators.

Gyan

On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 10:30 PM <gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com> wrote:

> Hi Tommy and Ian,
>
> I support the adoption of this draft (as co-author).
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Greg Mirsky
>
>
> Sr. Standardization Expert
> 预研标准部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 Standard Preresearch Dept./Wireline Product R&D
> Institute/Wireline Product Operation Division
>
>
>
> E: gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com
> www.zte.com.cn
> Original Mail
> *Sender: *TommyPauly
> *To: *IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org);
> *Date: *2021/07/01 09:48
> *Subject: **[ippm] Re-call for adoption: draft-xiao-ippm-ioam-conf-state*
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>
> Hello IPPM,
>
> Back in November, we had a call for adoption
> for draft-xiao-ippm-ioam-conf-state that led to several questions, and we
> asked for revised drafts.
>
> We’ve gotten several new versions, so Ian and I would like to re-start the
> adoption call to get people’s input on the current version.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-xiao-ippm-ioam-conf-state-10
>
> Please review the document and reply to the list to indicate if you
> support adopting this work by *Thursday, July 15*.
>
> Best,
> Tommy & Ian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*



*M 301 502-1347*