IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Fri, 21 May 2021 07:15 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3D13A1D40; Fri, 21 May 2021 00:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j3bhfAeBFJsg; Fri, 21 May 2021 00:15:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E605D3A1D44; Fri, 21 May 2021 00:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (85-76-10-129-nat.elisa-mobile.fi [85.76.10.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D9F30600C86; Fri, 21 May 2021 10:15:10 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1621581311; bh=ZNAhIdz6MzP9umt/6ThuSsZaAS5w6RnemEdLdf+FnSE=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=FuJlY2VqE+Cz7AO9oooQOJw4BKCeBViD0GU1S2bRVa2ysWdVk8ONH32xSK+n2Lo+I gTUlOz5/vhjT4IDxbB6Yc9JTpi3r+tPe5B6DuowqgMEyGgGLykPgTBros7bFin5JCH c3hBAFbdRVpbZDCqsn/s27+HVgEv0JoF34yjvgrY=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <088A9528-6312-4A62-B214-825CEF231AFF@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_712F68C4-E359-4F1E-B23B-BCBE05367A4B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\))
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 10:15:10 +0300
In-Reply-To: <CAM4esxQDYNQfzJSdD4_kc2HzACVt2kG8bWN-_3sTSBkbtKMCjw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "MORTON JR., AL" <acmorton@att.com>, "ippm-chairs@ietf.org" <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method@ietf.org>, "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "tpauly@apple.com" <tpauly@apple.com>
To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
References: <162072161364.15626.11472410331094167599@ietfa.amsl.com> <1764ec14e5394838b2a2802c45561aab@att.com> <6B3E6E27-AE72-4ABB-AE28-0A74B3EE93D0@eggert.org> <CAM4esxQKCooYRGf_+=fxgXNHpAGr69JdavqWX3o0CHiGda+nMw@mail.gmail.com> <98764a1876b047038bc02ae37d5faabd@att.com> <CAM4esxQv3upjAToW-Ph1537VGsb7SbDmSY7FAq2O2JnOqnivWA@mail.gmail.com> <CAM4esxQDYNQfzJSdD4_kc2HzACVt2kG8bWN-_3sTSBkbtKMCjw@mail.gmail.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: D9F30600C86.A325C
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/gnOqm1DiFiWVp_Jxixj9pEkQWzY>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 07:15:22 -0000

On 2021-5-20, at 22:03, Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK, we waived the downref.

And I cleared my related DISCUSS.

Thanks,
Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email