Re: [ippm] RE: draft-morton-ippm-reporting-metrics-03 (was: ippm Digest, Vol 42, Issue 3)

Al Morton <acmorton@att.com> Sat, 17 November 2007 18:41 UTC

Return-path: <ippm-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ItSbk-0001HU-R3; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 13:41:32 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ItSbj-0001F9-8h for ippm@ietf.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 13:41:31 -0500
Received: from mail120.messagelabs.com ([216.82.250.83]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ItSbg-000818-00 for ippm@ietf.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 13:41:31 -0500
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: acmorton@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-120.messagelabs.com!1195324886!30319175!1
X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.12.14.2; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.128.149]
Received: (qmail 11666 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2007 18:41:26 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp9.sbc.com (HELO flph024.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com) (144.160.128.149) by server-7.tower-120.messagelabs.com with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 17 Nov 2007 18:41:26 -0000
Received: from enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by flph024.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lAHIfQuw008748 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 10:41:26 -0800
Received: from flph023.ffdc.sbc.com (flph023.ffdc.sbc.com [150.234.117.36]) by flph024.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lAHIfMMA008719 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 10:41:22 -0800
Received: from ffdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by flph023.ffdc.sbc.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lAHIfMsX020775 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 10:41:22 -0800
Received: from maillennium.att.com (dns.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by flph023.ffdc.sbc.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lAHIfE0m020738 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 10:41:18 -0800
Message-Id: <200711171841.lAHIfE0m020738@flph023.ffdc.sbc.com>
Received: from acmt.att.com (unknown[135.210.73.154](misconfigured sender)) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with SMTP id <20071117184113gw10010gm4e>; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 18:41:13 +0000
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 13:38:40 -0500
To: "Konish Jr., Stephen" <steve.konish@windriver.com>, ippm@ietf.org
From: Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>
Subject: Re: [ippm] RE: draft-morton-ippm-reporting-metrics-03 (was: ippm Digest, Vol 42, Issue 3)
In-Reply-To: <F6AE8F99CFBB884E9681D609D859BAD30226A11B@ala-mail02.corp.a d.wrs.com>
References: <E1IqXD9-0007fw-25@megatron.ietf.org> <F6AE8F99CFBB884E9681D609D859BAD30226A11B@ala-mail02.corp.ad.wrs.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: 25620135586de10c627e3628c432b04a
Cc:
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org >
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org ?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org >
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org ?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org ?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ippm-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Steve,

Thanks for your comments
(and for working on Saturday to prepare them).

A few quick responses, below.  I will submit the
04 version before the deadline.

Al

At 11:36 AM 11/17/2007, Konish Jr., Stephen wrote:
>Re: draft-morton-ippm-reporting-metrics-03
>
>Hi...
>
>A few quick comments:
>
>1) I like how section 4 separates the discussion for the delay metric
>into the two points-of-view.  I would be nice to see the same format
>applied to section 3 where it's not as obvious how to interpret the
>discussion for each point-of-view.  A synopsis sentence in the beginning
>of the section and/or at the end might help here.

Good suggestion, 04 will have this.


>2) Question: I am not exactly sure what you mean by "forks" in this
>context in section 4.1.1 and again in section 4.3.  I think I know, but
>I would like to be sure.  Please clarify.

It's from "forks in the road" - I've clarified the intent in 04:
(4.3) ... where subsequent processing depends on
whether the packet arrives or times-out,


>3) silly comments:

Thanks, they all help.


>a) It would be great if we could spell out the ipdv acronym in section
>4.1.3 before it's used (simply for readability).
>
>b) 'seconds' is mispelled in section 6.2,
>
>c) and Gomathi's address has an extra comma in it.

Yes, so did mine, both are fixed now.


>Regards,
>
>Steve
>
>-----Original Message-----
>IPPM,
>
>This individual draft has just been revised.
>The new material in primarily in:
>    6.2.  Long-Term Reporting Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
>
>I hope to have a discussion of this new material at IETF-70, and any
>other comments of course, so please have a look at this draft.
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-morton-ippm-reporting-metrics-
>03.txt
>
>regards,
>Al
>
>_______________________________________________
>ippm mailing list
>ippm@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm


_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org 
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm