Re: [ippm] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data

["Frank Brockners (fbrockne)" <[e-mail]>]

FYI - earlier today, draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-09 was posted (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-09);

It addresses the list of issues below - which received quite a bit of discussion on github (click on the issues links below).
The corresponding key pull requests are:
* To address #157,#158,#159, #150, #149 corresponding to WGLC comments<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/pull/160>
* #152 update to clarify node capable of IOAM function in Section 4.4<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/pull/163>
* Issue #151 - Clarifications to SHOULD statements in section 3 of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-08<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/pull/162>
* Issue #156: Definition of timestamp in E2E option<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/pull/161>
* Data draft security considerations updated<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/pull/146>

In addition to draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data, there are also updated versions of the following IOAM-related WG documents:
* https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-ipv6-options-01
* https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-flags-01
* https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export-00

Frank

From: Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
Sent: Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020 12:09
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=[e-mail]>; IETF IPPM WG <[e-mail]>
Cc: Shwetha Bhandari (shwethab) <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [ippm] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data


Many thanks to all the reviewers of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-08 for their excellent and detailed feedback.

In order to structure process of including the feedback in the next revision of the document we've created a set of issues on git which not only contain the individual feedback, grouped by topic areas, but also suggest an approach on how to tackle an individual item:

  *   Issue #149: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-08 WGLC#1 comments: Editorial<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/issues/149>
  *   Issue #150: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-08 WGLC#1 comments: Nomenclature<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/issues/150>
  *   Issue #151: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-08 WGLC#1 comments: Clarifications to SHOULD statements<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/issues/151>
  *   Issue #152: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-08 WGLC#1 comments: Add further detail/clarifications to existing definitions<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/issues/152>
  *   Issue #153: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-08 WGLC#1 comments: Changes to existing definitions<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/issues/153>
  *   Issue #154: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-08 WGLC#1 comments: Suggestions for additional data fields<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/issues/154>
  *   Issue #155: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-08 WGLC#1 comments: Security related<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/issues/155>
  *   Issue #156: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-08 WGLC#1 comments: Needs clarification on timestamp insertion in E2E option<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/issues/156>
  *   Issue #157: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-08 WGLC#1 comments: Editorial on Pre-allocated and Incremental Trace Options<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/issues/157>
  *   Issue #158: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-08 WGLC#1 comments: Trace-Flags Registry clarification<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/issues/158>
  *   Issue #159: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-08 WGLC#1 comments: Editorial DEX leftovers<https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/issues/159>

It would be great if you could review the list to ensure that it is complete and captures all the feedback received. It would also be great to receive feedback on the suggested approaches - either on git or here on the list, to help and guide creating appropriate text in the document.

Thanks much, Shwetha & Frank



From: ippm <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> On Behalf Of Tommy Pauly
Sent: Montag,27. Januar 2020 19:09
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=[e-mail]<mailto:tpauly=[e-mail]>>
Cc: IETF IPPM WG <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data

Hi IPPM,

Thanks for the feedback on this draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data!

Based on the reviews, we would like to see a new version of the document posted, so that the group can take a look at those changes and see if we think we're ready after that.

Authors, please post a new version when ready.

Best,
Tommy

On Jan 7, 2020, at 8:47 AM, Tommy Pauly <tpauly=[e-mail]<mailto:tpauly=[e-mail]>> wrote:

Hello IPPM,

Happy New Year! This email starts a working group last call for "Data Fields for In-situ OAM" (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data/).

The last call will end on Tuesday, January 21. Please reply to [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> with your reviews and comments. Please indicate whether you think this document is ready for publication.

Best,
Tommy (as co-chair)
_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm