Re: IETF 87 IPRbis BOF evaluation

Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Fri, 02 August 2013 09:25 UTC

Message-ID: <51FB7ACA.4050605@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 11:24:26 +0200
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Subject: Re: IETF 87 IPRbis BOF evaluation
References: <FE6D23D3-BA71-4677-8699-44DBFD85DDE3@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <FE6D23D3-BA71-4677-8699-44DBFD85DDE3@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IAB IAB <iab@iab.org>, IESG IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Scott Bradner <sob@sobco.com>, IETF IPR WG <ipr-wg@ietf.org>
Precedence: list

On 08/02/13 10:48, Russ Housley allegedly wrote:
> I attended the IPRbis BOF.  The idea is to update the BCPs to
> incorporate experience from the last 8 years.  Jorge Contreras and Scott
> Bradner had a list of proposed changes, and they were each discussed in
> turn.  The discussion was much more calm than the discussion in Orlando,
> but this calmness did not allow review of all of proposed changes.  As a
> result, the BOF ended without a real conclusion.  By impression is that
> the I-D will be updated based on the ones that were discussed, and that
> discussion is needed on the remaining proposed changes.
> 
> I'd recommend a thread on each proposed change on the ipr-wg@ietf.org
> <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org> so that there is a hope of getting this stuff
> done before the end of 2013.

What do you think about a "use cases and experience" replacement for
3669?  If yes, I invite others to do it, since I won't get to it.

IETF 87 IPRbis BOF evaluation Russ Housley
Re: IETF 87 IPRbis BOF evaluation Scott Brim
Re: IETF 87 IPRbis BOF evaluation Bradner, Scott
Re: IETF 87 IPRbis BOF evaluation tsg
Re: IETF 87 IPRbis BOF evaluation Scott O Bradner