Re: IETF 87 IPRbis BOF evaluation

"Bradner, Scott" <sob@harvard.edu> Fri, 02 August 2013 09:28 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@harvard.edu>
X-Original-To: ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1199421E8269; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 02:28:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TqQxJANWjwGq; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 02:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ackroyd.harvard.edu (ackroyd.harvard.edu [128.103.208.29]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA1111E812C; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 02:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exchange.university.harvard.edu (entwedge0000000.university.harvard.edu [10.35.2.151]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ackroyd.harvard.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE28E9451; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 05:27:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ENTWHUBT0000005.university.harvard.edu (10.32.208.51) by ENTWEDGE0000000.university.harvard.edu (10.35.2.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.0; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 05:27:14 -0400
Received: from ENTWEXMB0000008.university.harvard.edu ([169.254.1.134]) by ENTWHUBT0000005.university.harvard.edu ([10.32.208.51]) with mapi id 14.03.0146.000; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 05:27:19 -0400
From: "Bradner, Scott" <sob@harvard.edu>
To: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF 87 IPRbis BOF evaluation
Thread-Topic: IETF 87 IPRbis BOF evaluation
Thread-Index: AQHOj13cjy41ktbsIku448S9OPMD+pmB6HwAgAAAzIA=
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 09:27:18 +0000
Message-ID: <29C80848-4FBF-4AEE-A99D-955AAF56FF62@harvard.edu>
References: <FE6D23D3-BA71-4677-8699-44DBFD85DDE3@vigilsec.com> <51FB7ACA.4050605@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <51FB7ACA.4050605@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [130.129.23.114]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <5E69922E976CA44EACEA4643720946FD@Exchange.university.harvard.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: IAB IAB <iab@iab.org>, IESG IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IETF IPR WG <ipr-wg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipr-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 09:28:21 -0000

that possibility came up during the BOF

Scott

Scott Bradner

Harvard University Information Technology
Innovation & Architecture
+1 617 495 3864
1350 Mass Ave., Room 760
Cambridge, MA 02138
www.harvard.edu/huit

On Aug 2, 2013, at 5:24 AM, Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
 wrote:

> On 08/02/13 10:48, Russ Housley allegedly wrote:
>> I attended the IPRbis BOF.  The idea is to update the BCPs to
>> incorporate experience from the last 8 years.  Jorge Contreras and Scott
>> Bradner had a list of proposed changes, and they were each discussed in
>> turn.  The discussion was much more calm than the discussion in Orlando,
>> but this calmness did not allow review of all of proposed changes.  As a
>> result, the BOF ended without a real conclusion.  By impression is that
>> the I-D will be updated based on the ones that were discussed, and that
>> discussion is needed on the remaining proposed changes.
>> 
>> I'd recommend a thread on each proposed change on the ipr-wg@ietf.org
>> <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org> so that there is a hope of getting this stuff
>> done before the end of 2013.
> 
> What do you think about a "use cases and experience" replacement for
> 3669?  If yes, I invite others to do it, since I won't get to it.
> _______________________________________________
> Ipr-wg mailing list
> Ipr-wg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg