Re: IETF 87 IPRbis BOF evaluation
Scott O Bradner <sob@sobco.com> Fri, 02 August 2013 09:08 UTC
Return-Path: <sob@sobco.com>
X-Original-To: ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A1511E82DA; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 02:08:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.465
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.465 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.030, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TD25p7e56Do8; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 02:08:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sobco.sobco.com (unknown [136.248.127.164]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D2811E8329; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 02:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E90BA1AE9E9; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 04:55:18 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sobco.com
Received: from sobco.sobco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sobco.sobco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9HORa3_KNvRI; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 04:55:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dhcp-1772.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-1772.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.23.114]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 911291AE9D9; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 04:54:26 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
Subject: Re: IETF 87 IPRbis BOF evaluation
From: Scott O Bradner <sob@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <FE6D23D3-BA71-4677-8699-44DBFD85DDE3@vigilsec.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 04:53:15 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B5D9D42F-3D7C-44E1-B97F-6E38294E1D25@sobco.com>
References: <FE6D23D3-BA71-4677-8699-44DBFD85DDE3@vigilsec.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 10:12:44 -0700
Cc: IETF IPR WG <ipr-wg@ietf.org>, IAB IAB <iab@iab.org>, IESG IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipr-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 09:08:17 -0000
the only thing we did not get to was Harald's question on how IPR in normative references should be handled - we got basic consensus on all of what we thought were the open issues Scott On Aug 2, 2013, at 4:48 AM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote: > I attended the IPRbis BOF. The idea is to update the BCPs to incorporate experience from the last 8 years. Jorge Contreras and Scott Bradner had a list of proposed changes, and they were each discussed in turn. The discussion was much more calm than the discussion in Orlando, but this calmness did not allow review of all of proposed changes. As a result, the BOF ended without a real conclusion. By impression is that the I-D will be updated based on the ones that were discussed, and that discussion is needed on the remaining proposed changes. > > I'd recommend a thread on each proposed change on the ipr-wg@ietf.org so that there is a hope of getting this stuff done before the end of 2013. > > Russ >
- IETF 87 IPRbis BOF evaluation Russ Housley
- Re: IETF 87 IPRbis BOF evaluation Scott Brim
- Re: IETF 87 IPRbis BOF evaluation Bradner, Scott
- Re: IETF 87 IPRbis BOF evaluation tsg
- Re: IETF 87 IPRbis BOF evaluation Scott O Bradner