Re: Copying and licensing....Re: Copying conditions

You know Paul - when you misquote me I also feel that your intent is to paint a picture that is different from the truth - but the facts are the facts - My commentary is accurate. The issue here is that the IPR-WG wants to change a number of things (some of which are actually broken), but that there is no way nowadays to get the entire IETF to agree to, or more importantly no way to retroactively change the terms and conditions on which the 4000 or so RFC's you quote were published under.

As to my point - this is a forum where all are supposed to comment but that clearly also is untrue, so ...
--
Regards,
Todd

This message (including any 
attachments) contains confidential 
information intended for a 
specific individual and purpose, 
and is protected by law. If you 
are not the intended recipient, 
you should delete this message. 
Any disclosure, copying, or 
distribution of this message, or 
the taking of any action based on 
it, is strictly prohibited. 

 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
> At 6:13 PM +0000 1/10/05, todd.glassey@att.net wrote:
> >Thanks Paul - this is exactly the bigger question to the IETF's 
> >governance process and how a single working group gets to set 
> >precedent and enforce it for all other working groups, considering 
> >that none of those other groups, have any involvement in this 
> >process.
> 
> No, it's not. Please don't misquote me to make a point of your own, 
> particularly one with which I disagree.

Yes it is.

> 
> --Paul Hoffman, Director
> --VPN Consortium
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ipr-wg mailing list
> Ipr-wg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg