Re: [Ips] AD review of draft-ietf-ips-iser
Mike Ko <mako@almaden.ibm.com> Tue, 07 November 2006 02:28 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhGhM-0007m9-SU; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:28:24 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhGhL-0007hJ-CW for ips@ietf.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:28:23 -0500
Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.146]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhGhJ-0001Bi-Ug for ips@ietf.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:28:23 -0500
Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e6.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kA72Sc51022124 for <ips@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:28:38 -0500
Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/NCO v8.1.1) with ESMTP id kA72SKOw275240 for <ips@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:28:20 -0500
Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id kA72SK0T007977 for <ips@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:28:20 -0500
Received: from d01ml604.pok.ibm.com (d01ml604.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.90]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kA72SJ8B007974; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:28:19 -0500
In-Reply-To: <C515B950-2704-41D3-82CC-038A002D7A02@netlab.nec.de>
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Ips] AD review of draft-ietf-ips-iser
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 HF277 June 21, 2006
Message-ID: <OF652BF908.EFC0E903-ON8525721F.0001905C-8825721F.000D955C@us.ibm.com>
From: Mike Ko <mako@almaden.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 18:28:16 -0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML604/01/M/IBM(Release 7.0.2HF32 | October 17, 2006) at 11/06/2006 21:28:19, Serialize complete at 11/06/2006 21:28:19
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: bcd240e64c427d3d3617cfc704e7fd7f
Cc: ips@ietf.org, ips-chairs@tools.ietf.org, ips-ads@tools.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ips@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP Storage <ips.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ips@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0655218144=="
Errors-To: ips-bounces@ietf.org
Lars, Sorry for the delay in replying to your review as I was out of the office for the past several weeks. I plan to submit a new revision of the iSER draft in a few days that addresses your concern. My comments are embedded. Mike Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de> wrote on 10/12/2006 01:52:55 AM: > Hi, > > please find the AD review of draft-ietf-ips-iser-05.txt below. In a > nutshell: No major issues but a number of comments and nits. > Depending on the amount of changes needed, an RFC Editor Note may be > sufficient, or a new revision may be needed. > > Lars > > ---<snip>--- > > Has idnits (unused references, etc.) and boilerplate issues (some due > to boilerplate changes during the too-long AD review - mea culpa). [mk] Boilerplate issues have been fixed. I have decided to leave unused references alone (such as RFC 2119 and Verbs) since they are pertinent to the draft. > INTRODUCTION, paragraph 12: > > Ko et. al. Expires April > 2006 1 > > Nit: s/et./et/ everywhere [mk] done > Section 7.3.12, paragraph 3: > > qualified with DataDescriptorReject which defines the Rejct > buffer. > > Nit: s/Rejct/Reject/ [mk] done > Section 8.1.1.3, paragraph 3: > > CmdSN of the PDU sent by the intiator in this category is x, > the PDU > > Nit: s/intiator/initiator/ [mk] done > Section 8.1.2, paragraph 7: > > (Implementatin note: SCSI task timeout and recovery can be a > > Nit: s/Implementatin/Implementation/ [mk] done > Section 9.1, paragraph 4: > > The Opcode field identifies the type of iSER Messages: > > Are there IANA actions required for these type codes? IANA section is > empty. [mk] No IANA actions are required as these are iSER specific fields in an iSER specific header. > Section 13.2, paragraph 2: > > [DA] M. Chadalapaka et al., "Datamover Architecture for iSCSI", > IETF > > Internet-draft, draft-ietf-ips-da-02.txt (work in progress), > > > Not normative? [mk] As David Black has stated in his response: "[DA] reference needs to remain informative as the iSER draft is supposed to be self-contained, and the DA draft will be published as Informational." > > [RDDPSEC] J. Pinkerton et al., "DDP/RDMAP Security", IETF Internet > > Draft draft-ietf-rddp-security-07.txt (work in progress), > April > > 2005 > > Not normative? [mk] Changed to normative > -- > Lars Eggert NEC Network Laboratories > > > [attachment "smime.p7s" deleted by Mike Ko/Almaden/IBM] > _______________________________________________ > Ips mailing list > Ips@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
_______________________________________________ Ips mailing list Ips@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
- [Ips] AD review of draft-ietf-ips-iser Lars Eggert
- [Ips] RE: AD review of draft-ietf-ips-iser Black_David
- Re: [Ips] AD review of draft-ietf-ips-iser Mike Ko