[Ips] RE: AD review of draft-ietf-ips-iser
Black_David@emc.com Thu, 12 October 2006 19:10 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GY5wZ-0007kW-CK; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:10:11 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GY5wY-0007kQ-Sj for ips@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:10:10 -0400
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com ([128.222.32.20]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GY5wW-00087v-IJ for ips@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:10:10 -0400
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (sesha.lss.emc.com [10.254.144.12]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k9CJA8ft024817; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:10:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from corpussmtp2.corp.emc.com (corpussmtp2.corp.emc.com [128.221.14.146]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.1.8/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k9CJ9U68010452; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:10:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: Black_David@emc.com
Received: from CORPUSMX20A.corp.emc.com ([128.221.62.13]) by corpussmtp2.corp.emc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:09:40 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:09:52 -0400
Message-ID: <F222151D3323874393F83102D614E05502B67514@CORPUSMX20A.corp.emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <C515B950-2704-41D3-82CC-038A002D7A02@netlab.nec.de>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: AD review of draft-ietf-ips-iser
Thread-Index: AcbuE4UAhUnHOt0sS0uc0jLWtgWvKAAHSXpg
To: ips@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Oct 2006 19:09:40.0426 (UTC) FILETIME=[F7C3F2A0:01C6EE31]
X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.4.0.264935, Antispam-Data: 2006.10.12.113442
X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=, SPAM=0%, Reason='EMC_BODY_1+ -3, EMC_FROM_0+ -2, NO_REAL_NAME 0, __C230066_P5 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __IMS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0'
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: a7d2e37451f7f22841e3b6f40c67db0f
Cc: lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de, ips-ads@tools.ietf.org, ips-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [Ips] RE: AD review of draft-ietf-ips-iser
X-BeenThere: ips@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP Storage <ips.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ips@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ips-bounces@ietf.org
IPS WG and iSER Authors, Let's get a new version of this draft, if for no other reason than Lars *will* use RFC Editor Notes to put the spelling corrections into the announcement that goes out to the world when the IESG approves this draft ;-) ... and the authors should take the fact that most of what Lars found is spelling and punctuation as a significant backhanded compliment on the quality of this draft! The [RDDPSEC] reference should be changed to normative, but the [DA] reference needs to remain informative as the iSER draft is supposed to be self-contained, and the DA draft will be published as Informational. Make sure the new version passes the idnits checker at: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/ *before* submitting it - an initial run of the checker on the current draft will indicate what boilerplate updates are needed. Thanks, --David ---------------------------------------------------- David L. Black, Senior Technologist EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 +1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786 black_david@emc.com Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 ---------------------------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: Lars Eggert [mailto:lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de] > Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 4:53 AM > To: ips@ietf.org > Cc: ips-chairs@tools.ietf.org; ips-ads@tools.ietf.org > Subject: AD review of draft-ietf-ips-iser > > Hi, > > please find the AD review of draft-ietf-ips-iser-05.txt below. In a > nutshell: No major issues but a number of comments and nits. > Depending on the amount of changes needed, an RFC Editor Note may be > sufficient, or a new revision may be needed. > > Lars > > ---<snip>--- > > Has idnits (unused references, etc.) and boilerplate issues (some due > to boilerplate changes during the too-long AD review - mea culpa). > > > INTRODUCTION, paragraph 12: > > Ko et. al. Expires April 2006 1 > > Nit: s/et./et/ everywhere > > > Section 7.3.12, paragraph 3: > > qualified with DataDescriptorReject which defines the Rejct buffer. > > Nit: s/Rejct/Reject/ > > > Section 8.1.1.3, paragraph 3: > > CmdSN of the PDU sent by the intiator in this category is x, the PDU > > Nit: s/intiator/initiator/ > > > Section 8.1.2, paragraph 7: > > (Implementatin note: SCSI task timeout and recovery can be a > > Nit: s/Implementatin/Implementation/ > > > Section 9.1, paragraph 4: > > The Opcode field identifies the type of iSER Messages: > > Are there IANA actions required for these type codes? IANA > section is > empty. > > > Section 13.2, paragraph 2: > > [DA] M. Chadalapaka et al., "Datamover Architecture for iSCSI", IETF > > Internet-draft, draft-ietf-ips-da-02.txt (work in progress), > > > Not normative? > > > [RDDPSEC] J. Pinkerton et al., "DDP/RDMAP Security", IETF Internet > > Draft draft-ietf-rddp-security-07.txt (work in progress), April > > 2005 > > Not normative? > > -- > Lars Eggert NEC Network > Laboratories > > > _______________________________________________ Ips mailing list Ips@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
- [Ips] AD review of draft-ietf-ips-iser Lars Eggert
- [Ips] RE: AD review of draft-ietf-ips-iser Black_David
- Re: [Ips] AD review of draft-ietf-ips-iser Mike Ko