Re: [Ips] AD review of draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-nodearch-key-02
Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de> Mon, 16 October 2006 15:12 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GZU8u-00034Q-Oh; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:12:40 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GZU8u-00034L-2T for ips@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:12:40 -0400
Received: from kyoto.netlab.nec.de ([195.37.70.21]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GZU8p-0000Zq-DT for ips@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:12:40 -0400
Received: from lars.local (u041251.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [203.212.41.251]) by kyoto.netlab.nec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2A51BAC99; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:12:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lars.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75E5251C17; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 00:12:28 +0900 (JST)
In-Reply-To: <F222151D3323874393F83102D614E05502B67549@CORPUSMX20A.corp.emc.com>
References: <F222151D3323874393F83102D614E05502B67549@CORPUSMX20A.corp.emc.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
Message-Id: <97510ADD-A70C-4FDE-8E2D-AE6C2859C9A3@netlab.nec.de>
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de>
Subject: Re: [Ips] AD review of draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-nodearch-key-02
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 00:12:26 +0900
To: Black_David@emc.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: a3f7094ccc62748c06b21fcf44c073ee
Cc: ips@ietf.org, Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com
X-BeenThere: ips@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP Storage <ips.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ips@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1518408432=="
Errors-To: ips-bounces@ietf.org
Works for me - this would really only be correcting a small oversight in 3270. On Oct 16, 2006, at 23:45, Black_David@emc.com wrote: > Julian and Lars, > > We could get clever here. The crucial language in RFC 3720 says: > > For IANA registered keys the string following X# must be > registered > with IANA and the use of the key MUST be described by an > informational RFC. > > and there's similar language for Y# digest formats and Z# > authentication > methods. > > Given the level of review this draft has received (not only on the > list, > but also in Montreal, I put crucial pieces of this draft's text on the > projector for word-by-word review), I don't think there would be any > problem with this draft becoming a proposed standard RFC, and it could > then update RFC 3720 to change "informational RFC" to "informational, > experimental or standards track RFC" in all three places. > > I would want to issue a WG Last Call on these changes (publish > nodearch-key as proposed, standard, update RFC 3720 to allow > experimental > and standards-track RFCs for X# keys, Y# digests, and Z# > authentication > methods), so that there is an adequate opportunity for anyone to > object. > > Comments? > > Thanks, > --David (ips WG chair) > ---------------------------------------------------- > David L. Black, Senior Technologist > EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 > +1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786 > black_david@emc.com Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 > ---------------------------------------------------- > > > ________________________________ > > From: Julian Satran [mailto:Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com] > Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 4:04 AM > To: Lars Eggert > Cc: ips@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Ips] AD review of > draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-nodearch-key-02 > > > > Lars, > > Yes we wanted new keys to be publicly documented without > requiring authors to go to a strict review (that might be hard to > get in > several years). > In retrospect we should have said "at least informational" > although there is (at least in theory) an ordering between RFC > "classes". > > Julo > > > > Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de> > > 16/10/06 03:40 > > > To > ips@ietf.org > cc > > Subject > Re: [Ips] AD review of > draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-nodearch-key-02 > > > > > > > On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:28, Lars Eggert wrote: > > Finally - why is this going for Informational and not PS? PS > seems > > appropriate. > > To be precise, I saw David's note on this from the document > writeup > ("This document is being published as Informational because RFC > 3720 > indicates that this class of key specification should be > published as > informational.") > > It's unfortunate that 3720 doesn't also allow publication at > Standards Track; I wonder what the rationale for this was. > Intuitively, this should be OK, because Standards Track > publication > has a higher bar. > > If the WG decides to go for Informational because of 3720, I'm > OK > with it. It may make sense to add a short note to the > introduction > explaining this. > > Lars > -- > Lars Eggert NEC Network > Laboratories > > > _______________________________________________ > Ips mailing list > Ips@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ips mailing list > Ips@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips Lars -- Lars Eggert NEC Network Laboratories
_______________________________________________ Ips mailing list Ips@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
- [Ips] AD review of draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-nodearch-… Lars Eggert
- Re: [Ips] AD review of draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-nodea… Lars Eggert
- Re: [Ips] AD review of draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-nodea… Dave W
- Re: [Ips] AD review of draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-nodea… Julian Satran
- RE: [Ips] AD review of draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-nodea… Black_David
- Re: [Ips] AD review of draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-nodea… Lars Eggert
- RE: [Ips] AD review of draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-nodea… Julian Satran