Re: FW: [Ips] Recent comments about FCoE and iSCSI

Julian Satran <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com> Thu, 26 April 2007 18:25 UTC

Return-path: <ips-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hh8ek-00029J-K9; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:25:26 -0400
Received: from ips by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Hh8ei-0001i4-Gx for ips-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:25:24 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hh8eh-0001b0-UK for ips@ietf.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:25:23 -0400
Received: from mtagate8.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.157]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hh8eg-0002Z6-EK for ips@ietf.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:25:23 -0400
Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate8.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3QIPLDt152796 for <ips@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:25:21 GMT
Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l3QIPLx53641534 for <ips@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:25:21 +0200
Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l3QIPL2B010819 for <ips@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:25:21 +0200
Received: from d12mc102.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12mc102.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.114]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3QIPL52010816; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:25:21 +0200
In-Reply-To: <34BDD2A93E5FD84594BB230DD6C18EA2015E3A69@nuova-ex1.hq.nuovaimpresa.com>
To: "Silvano Gai" <sgai@nuovasystems.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: FW: [Ips] Recent comments about FCoE and iSCSI
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 HF277 June 21, 2006
From: Julian Satran <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <OF36E98180.6BEEBEC2-ON852572C9.0064E438-852572C9.006531B1@il.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:25:20 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D12MC102/12/M/IBM(Release 7.0.2HF71 | November 3, 2006) at 26/04/2007 21:25:20, Serialize complete at 26/04/2007 21:25:20
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 093efd19b5f651b2707595638f6c4003
Cc: ips@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ips@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP Storage <ips.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ips@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1278259232=="
Errors-To: ips-bounces@ietf.org

Please send this community a reference of a 1000+ node datacenter using 
FCP as a single fabric.

Julo





"Silvano Gai" <sgai@nuovasystems.com> 
26/04/07 13:26

To
<ips@ietf.org>
cc

Subject
Re: FW: [Ips] Recent comments about FCoE and iSCSI






    * Subject: Re: FW: [Ips] Recent comments about FCoE and iSCSI
    * From: "Eddy Quicksall" <Quicksall_iSCSI at Bellsouth.net>
    * Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:15:22 -0400

Eddy Wrote: 

> Further, I think PAUSE is only for point-to-point and I think that is
too > restrictive.

Eddy,

In Fibre Channel credits are only point-to-point and FC networks work
well for datacenter environments.

Where is the difference?

-- Silvano



_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
Ips@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips

_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
Ips@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips