IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] draft-liu-ipsecme-ikev2-mtu-dect early TSVAREA review

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 31 October 2022 12:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8BE8C14CE36 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 05:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ysEVLXoaEhAa for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 05:17:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00:e000:2bb::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA5ABC14CE2F for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 05:17:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dyas.sandelman.ca (unknown [89.246.252.107]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E343C1F45D; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 12:17:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 34C08A0C3B; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 13:17:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dyas (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A44A0C39; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 13:17:27 +0100 (CET)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>, touch@strayalpha.com, ipsec@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <CADZyTknjaYshjZrY0-KcjMN_0bDUpx5RFvH=Hki4UpFs7jFTjQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <53B61B29-20F3-4DBD-962B-6F7CFCDEDEE6@strayalpha.com> <CADZyTknjaYshjZrY0-KcjMN_0bDUpx5RFvH=Hki4UpFs7jFTjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> message dated "Sun, 30 Oct 2022 21:33:17 -0400."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 13:17:27 +0100
Message-ID: <393145.1667218647@dyas>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/-EH9Tf4aqp2bg7C7I3aCf4M7qXs>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] draft-liu-ipsecme-ikev2-mtu-dect early TSVAREA review
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 12:17:32 -0000

The other question is whether or not we can just leverage RFC9268 to do this.
This is a recent 6man innovation.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email