IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] draft-liu-ipsecme-ikev2-mtu-dect early TSVAREA review

"touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com> Mon, 31 October 2022 15:28 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702A8C152581 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 08:28:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.324
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.324 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0ioZpTg31KC9 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 08:28:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-2.web-hosting.com (server217-2.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22C24C152578 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 08:28:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=7xLFwv5RWaWTIAApYh5cfEAa2e2rQTW+PwiCtBuzHR8=; b=mamO0nZJZbx9dNfUuhz+nKO3Em 6bQYdSWAdiXA0uM5FON68MvFaiyS6jeWKhLXlpetykVQdseSO4k1OOudcxIzMxIqXOg45bH4IjZco 0VRsHUdYxKOWxsqCwAH/WVfwlWoa3y1GXKZgo3nZ3cSBdrRwKmjabqpM7yaihTkiOGGlY6MQ8IE4g XMznH9t1ODTfpfJN4wuDaFulsEc7QotIJ4KNgjObt97le4lY36gm4iJkIn9wENtD3H0xXRqcFIwPO /afkdxwyux+1a3CzavhzQ7Dc2YXtbeHR+g/5FK2soC/mHrbqhu7FarW3mTZT0avZzM4TqjyYKG0oV kJMyrRuQ==;
Received: from cpe-172-114-237-88.socal.res.rr.com ([172.114.237.88]:60867 helo=smtpclient.apple) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1opWi3-005wWg-9K; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 11:28:23 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_22B93566-ED3F-4AFD-BEF2-B1239962E8BF"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.200.110.1.12\))
From: "touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <393145.1667218647@dyas>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 08:28:08 -0700
Cc: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>, ipsec@ietf.org
Message-Id: <F8BDDBA3-6E71-4CF4-8FF0-3D7CCE089958@strayalpha.com>
References: <53B61B29-20F3-4DBD-962B-6F7CFCDEDEE6@strayalpha.com> <CADZyTknjaYshjZrY0-KcjMN_0bDUpx5RFvH=Hki4UpFs7jFTjQ@mail.gmail.com> <393145.1667218647@dyas>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.200.110.1.12)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/PbWV4k8a20K1HBAhs38JPSAHn_g>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] draft-liu-ipsecme-ikev2-mtu-dect early TSVAREA review
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 15:28:33 -0000

On Oct 31, 2022, at 5:17 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> 
> The other question is whether or not we can just leverage RFC9268 to do this.
> This is a recent 6man innovation.

You’d need to decide whether you are trying to fix IPv4 or IPv6 (this doc relies on IPv4) and whether you think RFC9268 headers will help or hurt the chances of your IPv6 packets getting through a net.

Joe

—
Dr. Joe Touch, temporal epistemologist
www.strayalpha.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email